advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Could The BlackBerry Save Mobile Payments? Maybe It’s The Only Thing That Can

May 31st, 2012

But RIM? It’s desperate. It also already has more NFC-enabled phones out there than anyone else, plus payments experience in places like the Middle East, as well as a huge financial incentive: survival.

That means it’s the only phone maker that could say, “Forget coupons and ads and fighting with carriers and banks over who controls NFC payments—let’s flood the market with NFC-payment-capable phones. Oh wait, we’ve already done that. OK, let’s actually turn on that payment capability and turn the keys over to carriers and banks. We won’t make any money on payments. But if we sell enough phones, we’ll stay in business.”

A year ago, RIM wasn’t smart (or desperate) enough to do that. It was trying to negotiate deals with AT&T and T-Mobile in the U.S. and Rogers in Canada. But talks fell apart over whether payment-card information would be stored in the phone’s SIM card, where the carriers and banks would control it, or in a secure chip in the phone itself, where RIM could call the shots.

Now RIM has finally agreed to let Rogers and CIBC have control of NFC payments. If it can close similar deals with U.S. carriers, there will suddenly be lots of BlackBerry phones that can mimic contactless payment cards. (Putting a SIM card into lots of existing phones is trivial compared to selling lots of new NFC-enabled phones.)

Then all RIM has to do is to get its young, social-obsessed BlackBerry users to start an NFC-using fad. Which sounds pretty unlikely—until you realize that RIM managed to organize a mystery flash mob in front of an Apple Store in Sydney, Australia, last month. A black-clad crowd waved signs and chanted “Wake up!” before disappearing without explanation. RIM waited a week before owning up to the publicity stunt.

Dumb? Sure. Incoherent? You bet. The type of thing that sounds like it could inspire a fad of flash mobs waving signs and chanting meaningless slogans outside stores? Actually, yes.

If RIM can create an NFC fad, of course, it will just be a fad. But it might be enough to prime the mobile-payments pump. That could be the best shot at making all that retailer effort to get Google Wallet and ISIS working worth the trouble.

And if that NFC fad just burns out? Then RIM gets buried anyway, and we can all declare NFC to be the Pet Rock of payments and move on.

Either that or go back to waiting for Apple.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.