advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Neiman Marcus Know-It-All App May Require A Different Kind Of Associate

March 7th, 2012

That shift to creepy can happen even faster when the purchases in question were made online. There’s a strange distortion in how customers think about E-Commerce and privacy. Because they’re sitting at home when they order, even though “the computer” obviously knows everything the customer has ever bought and makes recommendations based on that, the experience feels more private.

Meanwhile, an associate—an actual human being—who appears to know that much can feel at best off-putting and at worst threatening to some customers.

Once associates are armed with large quantities of CRM information, will they need a workshop in “how not to be creepy?” It might be as simple as making sure that purchase history doesn’t lead to an associate saying “I see you bought” but instead just using the purchases as background knowledge to advance the current sale.

However, that may not be enough. When a sales associate knows next to nothing about a customer, the most successful salespeople are often the most aggressive. Their suggestions may be scattershot, but it feels like a process of zeroing in on what the customer is looking for. Take that highly aggressive sales associate and add a detailed sales history—and maybe a few personal details—however, and there’s nothing scattershot about the result. It can quickly become invasive.

Those highly aggressive, highly successful (ordinarily) associates may be exactly the people you don’t want to hire once you’ve put this type of technology in their hands.

And what happens when a customer’s preferred associate isn’t available? In an interesting touch, the Neiman Marcus app enables customers to check the schedules of associates to see when they’re working. (That potential for creepiness goes both ways.) But if the associate isn’t working or is busy with another customer, another associate will have to pick up the slack.

In a simpler time, that substitute associate would have known nothing at all about the customer except her name. Now the sub knows far too much about the customer’s purchase history but may not be able to instantly decipher any notes the preferred associate made about how to handle the customer.

That means the sub may have to exercise a very disciplined ignorance about the customer, letting her explain (again) what she prefers. In theory, that’s unnecessary, and it will likely stretch out the time required to make the sale. Managers will have to get used to that—and exercise their own self-discipline to let a technology-enhanced sale feel more natural to the customer.

There’s an irony to all this: The goal of all this CRM technology is to give a modern chain store the personal feel of a small shop where the proprietor knows every customer by name, face and history. That feel is a throwback to a time when customers had a lot less privacy, at least when it came to purchase histories. The irony is that reviving that atmosphere is going to take a lot more discretion and care when it comes to CRM and privacy.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.