Pier 1’s Frightening—and Frightened—Relationship With The Web

Written by Evan Schuman
July 15th, 2010

Sometimes, retail innovation is knowing when not to play. And for $1.3 billion Pier 1 Imports, it sometimes can mean knowing when to play again. But this time around, the home furnishings chain is only going so far—and it’s not nearly far enough.

Back in 2007, after years of E-Commerce activity, the retailer shut down all of its Web activity to pour its efforts into in-store. In six weeks, though, Pier 1 is returning to the Web: as a brochure site only. You can see, but you can’t buy, unless you drive to a store.

Early next year, however, Pier 1 will do something that almost no other chain has done: It will relaunch its site solely as a buy-online-pick-up-in-store effort. Here again, the chain has decided that its more than 1,000 brick-and-mortar locations are its universe and the Web will only function to the extent it can deliver physical traffic.

“This will allow us to leverage our store base without any of the complexities around online payment and fulfillment,” said one Pier 1 manager, who asked to not be named. “We believe this is a natural and low-risk extension of our business reach and brand.”

Although this is certainly an innovative approach, we’re not so sure we can agree with it being “low risk.” Pier 1 has poured in the money to put all of its merchandise on the site. Why force customers to either drive into a store or go away?

The chain’s representative speaks of “the complexities around online payment and fulfillment” as though both are some impenetrable fortress. If the technology is frightening, it can be outsourced. But E-Commerce has been fairly well proven.

Even worse, like many chains, Pier 1 has been shuttering its stores, making it even more likely that getting to a store will be too much of a hassle for customers. Think of it this way: If a fully functional E-Commerce site did nothing more for Pier 1 than give it a way to retain the customers who shopped at the stores they now need to shut down, isn’t that worth it?

It’s hard to envision a better time for E-Commerce and a stranger time to be afraid of it. We are afraid to even ask what the chain’s mobile and social networking strategies are.


2 Comments | Read Pier 1’s Frightening—and Frightened—Relationship With The Web

  1. Robert Martell Says:

    Really, I am old enough to want to see the mdse before I purchase.
    I am thoroughly annoyed by Store sites offering hard mdse that can only be bought ‘on-line’. 200 items, only 3 available in-store. Ticks me off completely, and I just ignore that merchant.

    Even a reasonable location with a half decent on-line inventory would be welcome.

    Every retailer should have a “Available in Stores Only” button, not the opposite. Losing sales and customers, otherwise.



  2. kt Says:

    i think pier 1’s website is the stupidest one i ever seen, i cant purchase online, weste my time in looking on line there btw since sale items not even available in the store but shows online but not avaible for purchase. what the…..


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.