Starbucks Sees Mobile Customization As New Way To Push In-Store

Written by Evan Schuman
October 21st, 2010

Consider this scenario: A Starbucks customer is walking the streets of Chicago and his phone beeps an alert. The mobile message tells the customer that the mayor of Chicago has just been indicted and that The Wall Street Journal‘s site has an exclusive live video interview with the president of the city council, but only for premium subscribers.

However, that video is available for free—right now—at a local Starbucks. By the way, the phone message tells the customer, “you’re three blocks from a store—and here’s a 25 percent off coupon for a cappuccino while you watch the video.”

On Wednesday (Oct. 20), Starbucks launched another campaign to get customers into its stores and, again, it has nothing to do with coffee. Called the Starbucks Digital Network, the program provides free access to a wide range of entertainment and news content that requires a fee elsewhere. The catch: Content can only be seen when customers are within the wireless LAN range of a Starbucks store. It gets better. The plan is to soon integrate the Starbucks Digital Network with loyalty cards, which opens a whole new world of customer data. With Yahoo as its partner, that information could find its way almost anywhere. They’ll know not only customers’ latte preferences, but their preferences in news and entertainment, too.

As evidenced by the Chicago scenario, this data could eventually provide highly customized hooks to lure customers into the stores.

Adam Brotman, the vice president for Starbucks Digital Ventures, said the chain will soon offer additional (ultra-premium?) content just for Starbucks loyalty customers. “Many will be localized: ultra-local news,” he said, because the mobile devices will not only know the location of the customers, but the system will obviously know the precise location of each Starbucks Wi-Fi hotspot.

“In the future, we will able to offer a different experience” for different locations, potentially with either different content sources or different selections within the existing content sources, Brotman said.

How far the chain will go with this program is unclear. “We are capable of doing it, but we have to walk before we run,” Brotman said.

He spoke of Yahoo being able to message content—and learn from its use—in a way that Starbucks can’t. “They could potentially marry specific stories with specific customers. We could do it, but we want to be careful with that. It tends to be best if [customers] have opted in for that optimization or relevancy.”

This data-intensive effort also has the potential to make the original social connections of Starbuck easier. All of the people reading stories about a particular news event might be messaged about connecting with each other at specific times to discuss what is happening and to perhaps take action to deal with that event. Over lots of cups of coffee, of course.


One Comment | Read Starbucks Sees Mobile Customization As New Way To Push In-Store

  1. Not convinced Says:

    or…they could charge less for coffee and focus on the user experience, in-store promos, etc…you know, the stuff you and I actually care about.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.