advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

The Privacy Triple Play: Digital Giftcards Using Facebook Data And Geolocation

May 2nd, 2012

The gift-giver can then choose to sweeten the amount of the giftcard with a payment card. That card can be posted for all to see, and anyone can add more money to the card. All of that information is saved and can be shared with partners.

Here’s a nice touch: The free giftcard expires within 30 days, but if anyone adds anything at all to the card, it can legally no longer expire. A reminder will also be issued for the free cards when the expiration is imminent.

The retail partners “don’t pay us a penny until an actual gift has been redeemed,” said Greg Spector, Wrapp’s head of communications. Once redeemed, retailers pay “a small transaction fee” plus “a percent of the value of the additions to the card,” Spector said.

The company is still figuring out exactly how it wants to deploy the geolocation reminders, Ehn said, adding that Wrapp is exploring a variety of GPS, cell tower and Wi-Fi access point combinations. As a practical matter, he said, mall options would likely do little more than flag that the store exists somewhere in the mall the customer has just entered, as opposed to directing the customer to the store using Wi-Fi and a mall map.

The privacy issues are real, though. Consumers may not realize—and some may not have intended to consent to—Facebook is giving away private information directly tied to their names. But a vague $25 giftcard—given by a Facebook friend—may not, on its own, set off any privacy alarms. The consumer would likely have no way of knowing that the amount was triggered by their age, gender or location.

Gender is probably the least privacy problematic, because it’s often obvious by either a first name or a Facebook photo. Location is one level up—privacy-invasion-wise—although that, too, is often (but not always) indicated on a public Facebook page. Age, though, is definitely a potential landmine.

This might also lend itself to lots of gifts to friends who would otherwise never receive them. For example, someone with a very large number of “Facebook friends” (many of whom they hardly know) might opt to send the free version of the giftcards to everyone on their list. (Why not, as long as others are paying for it.)

That could make the benefit cited by some—Karl-Johan Persson, CEO of the 2,500-store H&M apparel chain, for example, issued a statement that quoted him saying, “One of the things we like best is that with Wrapp, H&M is being recommended to you by your friends.”—much less meaningful.

Still, this combo of mobile-housed digital giftcards, geolocation and Facebook data is certainly giving the giftcard its best chance for 2012 relevance.


advertisement

One Comment | Read The Privacy Triple Play: Digital Giftcards Using Facebook Data And Geolocation

  1. Thad Peterson Says:

    This is a really interesting idea that portends a really powerful trend toward linking publicly available personal information with transaction data to deliver perfectly relevant offers in the right place at the right time.

    Privacy will be an issue forever but my guess is that the power of relevance will overwhelm consumer concerns about privacy. After all, that’s what Facebook is all about.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.