advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

What’s The Future Of M-Commerce Look Like? Home Depot Snr. VP/IT: Customers Will Dictate Real-Time Inventory

April 3rd, 2011

“Technology and mobile devices make it easy to instantly jump to all of these wonderful things that they can do that are way out in the future. If you just pull up the Top 10 retailers [on mobile], and if they have a WAP site or an app, just try and navigate,” Bunner said. “It’s funny to see a lot of people making the same mistakes as 10 years ago in E-Commerce. Things are hard to navigate. You hit the wrong button, because they are too small. Pages aren’t tagged. This will be the year of better user experience on mobile, ubiquity across applications” and 2012 will be the year for fancy stuff.

Home Depot’s Kinzey laid out a more conservative future vision.

Let’s say that “you came into our store and you had a [home improvement] project going. You had part of it online, through Kitchen Design, and part of it is on your phone. We will know where all of the sources for it are and we’ll also know where all of the statuses are and be able to help you accordingly,” Kinzey said. “And you go on to whatever device and see that yourself. That’s an end-goal objective and we have a roadmap to get there from here. It shouldn’t matter to us how you sourced it. It is not something we’re doing today. I am not aware that anybody is doing it holistically all the way around the clock today, but I think everybody is probably striving for that right now.”

Ann Taylor’s Sajor made his point about the future of mobile by going backward in time—to the 1800s, to be precise.

“We all like to want to hang onto models that are rooted in 19th Century technology for some reason. What’s a cashwrap for in a store? It’s a place where you could put the great big brass register, with the big arm on the side that went ‘Ka-ching!’ Why do we need one? What’s the point? What’s it there for?” Sajor asked. “The only reason it’s there is because you still have this big thing sitting there that you have to interact with. There’s no reason why cashwrap can’t be a device sitting in the palm of the associate’s hand. Scan, scan, scan; swipe the card. Many retailers are doing this today. It works. Why is that artifact of the 1970s sitting in your store? Reclaim the space and use it more effectively.”


advertisement

One Comment | Read What’s The Future Of M-Commerce Look Like? Home Depot Snr. VP/IT: Customers Will Dictate Real-Time Inventory

  1. Robert Porter Says:

    To Mr. Concors,

    Why would seeing what a person’s spend matter? I get the feeling that you care because the more they’ve spent in the past the more you’d be willing to do in order to make things better. That seems pretty short-sighted to me. One, the person lashed out on Facebook or other social site. They are spreading negative views about your company. Their audience is NOT going to ask how long they’ve been going to Pizza Hut, nor how much they’ve spent there in the past. They’re going to want to here the story of how your company has done them wrong. Second, it’s been a long accepted position that it’s cheaper to keep customers than get them. Here, you’ve gotten both customers – one a short time and the other a long time. But you did get them… And now you’re concern is how much they’ve spent over the years? I’d be willing to bet that unless it was something absolutely ridiculous (in which case write either one off as a customer), the long term customer is going to come back after cooling off about it anyway. Regardless, the person has started a personal advertising campaign that will be global and archived for future generations that’s counter to your brand. No one outside of you cared how much they spend there. That’s what the focus needs to be.

    Rob

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.