advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Amazon Same-Day Delivery? Stores Not The Target

July 18th, 2012

The cutoff times in the other cities range from 8:30 AM in the Big Apple to 10:00 AM in the City of Brotherly Love to 11:00 AM in Baltimore and Boston, with the absolute latest being noon and that’s only for Amazon’s mothership neighbors in Seattle.

The big question, though, is where is Amazon planning to go with this? Amazon’s Prime shoppers, of course, are a trivial percentage of its customer base. Will Amazon expand this offering nationally, for all customers?

Let’s look at the restrictions and what is likely to happen.

  • Restrictions On Eligible Products
    Amazon has from the very beginning understood that its sales-tax haven would be a limited-time advantage. That never meant it would hold back on any legal devices the company could deploy to stretch it out as long as possible, including our personal favorite when it posted the most embarrassing movie and book purchases it could find when fighting North Carolina tax-collection efforts in 2010.

    Now that it’s preparing to charge sales tax in just about every state, Amazon is free to aggressively open distribution centers (DCs) anywhere it wants. Those DCs will not only add new areas for same-day delivery but they’ll also enable Amazon to radically expand which products are eligible.

    “If we’re building a million square feet in LA, there’s a lot of product in there,” said one Amazon-ite. “In Phoenix, it’s 4 million square feet of fulfillment space plus.”

  • Restrictions On Pricing
    Like everything else in retail, pricing decisions can truly dictate purchases. If two-day shipments are low cost or free—and don’t forget that more DCs will likely reduce three-day and two-day shipments in many areas to two-day and next-day, at no additional customer cost—how many customers will cough up extra money for next day? This really begs the question of how many will pay an extra $9. Given that Amazon Prime fees subsidize those costs, it might be a lot more, thereby reducing the incentive.

    But one Amazon source suggested a more likely scenario would be to offer same-day delivery for free, with possible restrictions on order size. Suddenly, that takes on much more power. But not against physical stores—against other E-Commerce sites.

    Amazon is nothing if not dependent on some very sophisticated homegrown apps. Done intelligently, costs on local same-day shipments could be tiny, potentially lower than the cost of mailing orders in bulk. If the system notes that it is preparing to ship 56 packages to the same huge apartment building in Manhattan or 197 boxes to the same office building in Los Angeles, couldn’t a local truck do this for a lot less?

    It’s lost on no one that once tax issues are gone, the biggest price differentiator between E-Commerce and physical stores is delivery fees. Remove them, and Amazon has made up for the loss of the tax advantage many times over.

    By the way, Amazon is not only thinking about all of this, but it’s amused by where such a strategy could go. The company pointed us to a truly funny video that has Amazon going beyond same-day delivery, into yesterday delivery. Amazon neither made the video nor denied that it’s exploring this time-travel approach. The company was kidding. I think.


  • advertisement

    2 Comments | Read Amazon Same-Day Delivery? Stores Not The Target

    1. Scott Says:

      I am pretty sure that is a new focus for Amazon, and I would think the implications for local stores may be real. You would not get the touch/feel or the absolute instant gratification, but for the right price reduction – it would surely be pretty attractive to many people. A real stretch thought might be Amazon opening tiny catalog stores where people can browse merchandise on nice Amazon computers and displays, pay for their merchandise via PayPal Here and then expect their product in a few hours. Real estate costs would be fairly low, but they could drive foot traffic in major malls or urban shopping districts into their stores.

    2. EL Says:

      If AMZN allocates inventory across its distribution network using the 80/20 rule – that is 80 of the stuff that sells is 20 of your owned SKUs, this will absolutely hurt physical retail, especially if they focus allocation on dry goods and diapers (you know, stuff that costs a lot to ship cross country?)

      The beauty of this shift to same day fulfillment is that AMZN doesn’t have to go all-in for its core businesses (books and media) because those have shifted to digital.

      Yes, this will squeeze other etailers, but the true target is big box retail. All of them.

    Newsletters

    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
    advertisement

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    StorefrontBacktalk
    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.