advertisement
advertisement

This is page 4 of:

Home Depot Mobile: Great, Unless You Have To Use It, Associates Say

March 3rd, 2011

Then there are complaints about not enough devices to go around and managers hoarding the belt holsters (these phones are too big to fit comfortably in a pocket)—or hoarding the phones themselves, which means managers are carrying the mobile POS devices instead of the associates who will actually use them with customers.

And there’s the fact that the beeps that confirm scanning will mysteriously disappear for 20 seconds if a call comes in on the radio. In addition, there’s a three-second delay after scanning before the device responds—not a big deal when an associate is scanning a price for a customer, but an eternity for someone doing inventory. A host of other task-specific complaints come from the people who are actually using the devices to do their jobs.

In short, those associate complaints detail everything that’s wrong with the first draft of these mobile devices. It’s not the sort of thing software developers and project managers like to hear—even though many of the associates are complaining with one breath and describing the mobile devices as “great tools,” “spectacular,” “a major leap forward” and “so cool!” in the next.

Unfortunately, after most of a year since the First Phone rollout began, some Home Depot associates get the feeling that IT isn’t listening. “We have all found the obvious and not-so-obvious glitches and flaws in the First Phone and brought them to the attention of folks who should care but either don’t or are powerless to affect changes to correct them,” one grumbled. “The thing was not quite ready for prime time and suggestions and critiques go ignored, because we are not qualified to question the work of the ‘experts.'”

That may not be the reality, but it’s the perception. Listening to those criticisms, and even encouraging them, is exactly what IT should be doing. There’s no magic to getting business processes right in any IT initiative. It’s never going to be right the first time through. And it only gets better after the associates in the stores put the technology through its paces, point out the problems and make suggestions.

Interestingly, none of the Home Depot associates voiced any complaints about the First Phone’s ability to perform mobile checkout for a customer. Even if nothing else works perfectly, that’s a start.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.