advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Macy’s New Inventory Program Gave Cashier A Way To Steal

August 24th, 2011

The Search-and-Send program—which Macy’s started late last year with a few West Coast stores and then expanded to 23 stores (including Dewitt) this year—is designed to let stores not only search the central warehouse and E-Commerce inventories but also have access to the inventory from nearby stores.

The program offers some benefits for fraudsters. The associate in this case would likely have been hesitant to ring up his in-store purchase himself—a policy violation that could easily be detected—and ringing it up through a fellow associate is also dangerous, because the other associate might recognize that the watch should cost $3,000.

But the anonymity of the Web is ideal, because those packers don’t care about pricing. Given that the associate wouldn’t have any ability to change prices online, the fraud would be difficult. Search-and-Send provides the best of both worlds; the price is under the store’s control—and, therefore, the associate’s control—but the shipping option provides the lack of a personal interaction. Had the discount been much more typical, there’s a fine chance it might have never been detected.

Macy’s CFO Karen Hoquet on August 10 told an investor call how much she liked Search-and-Send, which made the chain “more likely to be in-stock when the sales associate searched for an item and, therefore, satisfy more demand. So now, throughout the company, you’re able to go to a Macy’s store and have the associate search the inventory invisible to the sales associate but will pull it from stores in addition to the Internet warehouse. And this is all a part of trying to be able to better satisfy customer demand and also, over time, make our inventory investment far more productive. It’s really quite exciting.”

At least one store associate apparently felt the same way.

According to statements from police and Macy’s loss prevention—statements that may not necessarily be precise—the associate gave conflicting explanations.

A typed loss-prevention statement, signed by the associate,said: “At no time did any manager or supervisor authorize me to process my own transaction, manually mark down the price of the watch or have it sent to my own address.”

A police statement, which he did not sign (the police said he refused to sign), quoted the associate saying: “I placed an order for a watch and made a mistake. When I received the watch, I went to Macy’s and tried to return it.” In a court filing, police quoted the associate as saying: “I purchased the watch at my register. I entered the wrong price. I saw this when the receipt printed. I threw the receipt away.”


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.