advertisement
advertisement

RFID Buttons: Cute Or Ominous?

Written by Evan Schuman
December 8th, 2010

A Chinese RFID manufacturer has started shipping RFID tags designed to look—and apparently function—as real buttons. They also can be washed with no harm to the sealed RFID mechanism.

On the plus side, this flips a problem with today’s RFID tags. They are relatively obvious—if one looks, even a little—and consumers want to quickly remove them and throw them away. By turning a tag into a button, however, consumers suddenly want to preserve it, most likely not even realizing that it’s an RFID tag.

But there’s a danger in these not-so-cute-as-a-button buttons. The problem with these tags—called RFID Laundry Tags and made by Daily RFID Co.—is that there is no application today that would benefit from the tags staying on the garment after purchase.

If the tag is going to be removed anyway, why bother disguising it?

Whether valid or not (and the nature of this particular design raises troubling questions), this design will fuel consumer privacy advocates’ concerns that retailers and manufacturers want to track their products—and their customers—after they’ve left the store.

These concerns have been voiced for years but generally are dismissed because no chain or manufacturer was actually using the capability. But form-factors such as these faux buttons have the very real potential of breathing new life into such concerns.

To be fair, these may not be faux buttons, in that they may actually function as buttons. In which case, they’re not faux: They’re Trojan horses. But in this version of the classic Trojan War tale, the soldiers inside the horse might turn around and attack their retail Greek creators.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.