advertisement
advertisement

Sears CIO Lasts 20 Months: Kasbe Out

Written by Evan Schuman
December 22nd, 2010

The $44 billion 3,900-store Sears chain has one of the lengthiest histories of any major U.S. retailer. But given how long its stores have lasted, its latest CIO’s tenure lasted not very long at all.

Timothy Kasbe, a celebrated IT exec who arrived at the chain in February 2009 after having served as the CIO of India’s largest retail chain, quietly left the company early last month (November). Very quietly. No announcement; no SEC filing (which is often done for the separation of such a senior C-level executive as senior VP). And Kasbe didn’t update his LinkedIn profile. Just a quick deletion from the Sears Web site.

Some vendors who had appointments with Kasbe were told by his office that the meetings had to be canceled and that he’s no longer with the company. They were also told to keep that information quiet.

To be fair, Sears is hardly known as a chain where executives run up substantial tenures. Various senior-level division heads have lasted much less than the 20 months that Kasbe did. And, yes, the cases are pretty much split evenly between those execs who Sears tired of and those who couldn’t handle the Sears culture. Individuals familiar with this case were mum about who tired of who first in Kasbe’s case.

Sears is now listing no CIO. Company spokesman Chris Brathwaite would only say that IT VP Keith Sherwell is running the Information & Technology Group “until a permanent replacement is named.”

The reasons for Sears’ high executive turnover—where the CIO is sometimes considered the world’s best paid temp—are multiple. The consensus, however, seems to be that although senior management—and especially the board—understands the chain needs major changes and recruits top talent to execute those changes, they are still highly resistant to making said changes.

That creates an atmosphere where new execs propose new approaches and get slapped down. The executives get discouraged and unhappy. And corporate is also unhappy, because they see changes as challenges. This can be described as sort of a “this is how we’ve been doing it for more than 100 years, young man/young lady” attitude. In the meantime, problems mount, sales drop and it’s always easy to blame whatever executives are in charge, regardless of whether their requests are frequently being overruled.

Slightly interesting side note: Even though Sears is often referred to as one of the oldest American retail chains, its 1886 founding doesn’t even qualify it for the top seven oldest chains. Brooks Brothers (1818), Lord & Taylor (1826), Macy’s (1858), A&P (1859), Bloomingdale’s (1861), Saks Fifth Avenue (1867) and Barnes & Noble (1873) are all older. (Thanks go to RISNews for having tracked this history a few years back.)

Before Kasbe served in India as the CIO for Reliance Retail—where he ran through the Mumbai streets to escape the terrorist attack on that city back in November 2008—he spent more than 10 years in a retail practice at IBM.

One of the chief non-tech focuses for Kasbe—who has a Duke University MBA—are global orphan care and build-a-village initiatives, with a particular focus on foster care programs in India. He’ll be among the retail IT speakers at next month’s RetailROI (Retail Orphans Initiative) SuperSaturday event in New York City, hours before the opening of the National Retail Federation’s annual tradeshow just a few miles away.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.