advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Shipping Shift: Why Not Use Every Store As Its Own DC?

February 15th, 2012

And FedEx had little reason to look into such issues, because it would accomplish nothing but hurt its on-time delivery record. These are your distribution partners, and FedEx is one of the better ones. Taking the deliveries back—at least within XX miles of your stores—provides quite a few benefits. First, there is the delivery from a smiling person with your store’s logo on his/her uniform. Second, there is the ability to offer same-day delivery, which can be the beginning of an advantage over pure-play E-tailers. (Why buy from Macys.com instead of Amazon? Now you have an answer.)

There’s also complete visibility into tracking. With a local delivery, tracking is somewhat easier; you can track the trucks, the packages and the drivers. And unlike the FedEx example, no one at Target.com will have a reason to look the other way if Target packages are not arriving when and how they should.

If you’re going to be blamed for how your packages are delivered, shouldn’t you at least own the process? This is all about extending the brand. For some, this approach could go beyond delivery, with the package person asking if the customer needs help setting up the product or maybe carrying the box into the house. Or maybe it’s someone who asks if the customer needs any assistance with the product and, if so, can immediately call someone on his or her mobile to immediately talk with that customer.

The traditional argument has been that a brick-and-mortar only fights against an E-tailer by pushing the in-store experience. This approach enables the merged-channel retailer to extend that experience right back into the customer’s front yard and maybe through the front door.

How far you want to push this service is a very legitimate question. Back in 2007, the Tweeter electronics chain—OK, so the company went bankrupt the next year. Does that mean it didn’t have some good ideas?—started exploring using virtual reality to test surround-sound home entertainment systems. The idea was to do things that no E-tailer could match, by leveraging its ability to get personal with customers.

It’s not a bad idea to think about, especially the next time you hear about a flat-screen television thrown over some customer’s fence.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.