advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

The Inventory Nightmare: When Shoes Show Up Where They’re Not Wanted

January 9th, 2013

And remember, this is Macy’s, which has pushed faster and farther into merged-channel than most chains have. Macy’s already ships E-Commerce orders from stores—specifically, whichever store is most overstocked with a product (and a single unit that’s not in the store’s assortment is sort of the ultimate overstock). Macy’s has the enterprise-wide view of inventory and the back-room people in place to do the shipping. All the systems are in place, and it’s still a monumental pain.

The best approach? “We’ve all got to get smarter about how we measure demand,” the Macy’s exec said.

Michelle Tinsley, the director of transactional retail at Intel, said this problem is impacting a huge range of retailers, and it needs to be dealt with quickly.

“In a perfect world, I think what would happen in that example is the return that comes back is accepted, because the customer views that brick-and-mortar location as today’s face of that retailer, so they need to uphold that brand image and take the return,” Tinsley said. “But in this merged world, (the chain needs to) allow any location in that nationwide retailer to see those shoes now bonused back into inventory and to then sell them very quickly and ship it from that location. So even though it was returned to a brick-and-mortar store, let it be seen in those warehousing systems so that the next order that comes in over the Internet or from a store in Cincinnati gets placed from that store in, say, California.”

Tinsley argues that this problem is one manifestation of the old way of retailers looking at problems.

“I think you need to flip it. Instead of saying, ‘I’ve got the inventory in the wrong place,’ say, ‘Well, I’ve just got to open up the inventory to where the next demand signal is coming from. And if that next demand signal is a pair of boots and it’s been returned to L.A. but now you’re getting a new order out of Rochester, N.Y., ship the boots from LA to the customer in Rochester, N.Y., instead of fulfilling it out of the warehouse. It’s about creating that visibility so that we really focus and design the system to point to the demand signals and where the customer is at and worry a little less about the inventory controls and the physicality of where the inventory’s at.”

Tinsley discussed this and related issues during Part Two of this week’s StorefrontBacktalk Radio segment.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.