advertisement
advertisement

This is page 3 of:

The M-Commerce Paradox: If You Succeed, You’ll Fail

June 10th, 2010

If mobile connectivity is limited, however, that app might not work at all. Or it might work just well enough for a customer to signal her position but not receive the message with the coupons while she’s still in the store.

WiFi faces a different set of problems as a basis for mobile applications. More channels are available for WiFi, and WiFi’s limited range might allow a retailer to use lots of WiFi access points to blanket a store with a WiFi network. But while taxpayers shell out for GPS and mobile users pay their own phone bills, it’s the retailer who pays for that blanket of WiFi: access points, network cable, switches and servers.

Meanwhile, WiFi just keeps getting more popular as an easy way to set up quick, ad hoc networks. That’s why Steve Jobs’ iPhone demo kept crashing. “There are 570 WiFi base stations operating in this room,” Jobs told the crowd after Apple engineers identified the problem. “We can’t deal with that.”

But WiFi also has security and, much more importantly, security perception issues. “Do you think your customers are ready to acquire, trust and provision your WiFi network on their smartphone device when they enter your store?” asked our cynical reader. “Are you going to offer generic Internet access in your store via WiFi (become a hotspot) or whitelist to only your offers?”

All of these details are part of the IT foodchain of control. Retailers have neither control nor influence over GPS. If it stops working, there’s little a retailer can do about it. One small step down are carriers’ cellular networks.

If an E-Commerce site is anticipating huge traffic and bandwidth demands, the IT department can do quite a bit to secure more bandwidth and prepare for the deluge. But if an upcoming event is likely to overload the Sprint, AT&T or Verizon networks in one part of town, there’s precious little that can be done. If it’s a big enough deal and there’s plenty of time, very expensive arrangements can—in theory—be made. But it’s unlikely.

Retailers can, however, have a huge amount of control over WiFi. But there’s still the hurdle of getting consumers comfortable with using your WiFi network.

Ultimately, the best way to deal with the M-Commerce paradox is via mobile moderation. If you’re testing a mobile payment method, you do not want huge audiences pouring in at once. Keep your marketing efforts to a low level, perhaps allowing some blog references and pamphlet distribution work their magic.

When you invariably have to go larger, make sure the marketing department uses all of its tricks to spread out the load. E-mail blast offers that are time-limited and stagger the invites. Perhaps do only one department and push only limited items. You don’t want 5,000 customers descending on your pilot store from 1 to 2 P.M. You want them spread out over days or even weeks.

Those same marketing tactics can also gently nudge customers into becoming more comfortable with WiFi, by potentially offering guarantees of security coupled with strong financial incentives to use it. Perhaps a 15-percent discount for WiFi purchases, compared with only 10-percent for direct? If you can nudge customers onto WiFi, you have the ability to build more infrastructure yourself—something that’s not an option if you depend on mobile networks.

None of this makes wireless retail apps impossible. It just makes it more challenging–as long as you keep your enthusiasm in check. Just don’t try ignoring physics.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read The M-Commerce Paradox: If You Succeed, You’ll Fail

  1. Tony Rosati Says:

    Very good discussion relating to RF penetration issues inside big box retailers and malls.

    One option that seems interesting is to use ‘geofencing’ capabilities of GPS. This would allow downloading of M-Commerce e-coupons when people who have “opted in” are within a certain distance (like half a mile) of the store while still outside of the building.

  2. Jim Says:

    Where does bluetooth fall in with this? Is that a viable option?

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.