advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Will Web Analytics Work For Mobile? Home Depot IT Chief: Most Retailers Are Behind, Think “We’ll Get To That Later”

March 21st, 2011

As Pizza Hut CIO Baron Concors argued, on mobile, more is quite often not better. “When I see long times on our pages, it’s not necessarily a good thing. Sometimes that can mean you have people who are really confused about how your Web site works and you have to go much deeper, on a page-by-page basis, and see what people are clicking on, what pages they are going back to, going forward to, who they’re leaving your site for, where they came to your site from. All of these things come together to tell a story that you’ve got to get deeper on,” Concors said. “On the mobile side, I think it is important to understand conversion rates, traffic, where people are dropping off the application and things like that. We’re probably a little bit ahead in that game, in the sense that a lot of the vendors that do Web analytics are just now offering this for mobile devices, so I think you’ll see a greater focus on it going forward.”

Another panelist, Ann Taylor CIO Mike Sajor (he was just promoted to CIO from CTO), took a very different position. He challenged whether mobile-only analytics is a good thing, insofar as it reinforces the disjointed multi-channel—as opposed to the integrated merged channel—philosophy.

“I’m a little uncomfortable with some of the things I’m seeing emerging around the differentiation of channels in analytics. To me, there’s an opportunity for cross-correlation and doing intelligent analytics across the entire behavior of an individual. Last I looked, I am one person. I represent myself through different personas in different channels at different times. Why would it make sense to overanalyze within the constraints of a single channel what my behaviors are?” Sajor asked. “What I am looking for are analytic engines that help me understand behaviors across these different channels but don’t try and pigeonhole me in one of them, because that’s not how I appear.”

Not only is paying special attention to one channel not necessarily helpful, it can actually be misleading. Sajor detailed how he envisioned an end-to-end customer picture—the much ballyhooed single view of the customer—working in a mobile reality.

“Data behaves in funny ways, and it tends to crop up where you least expect it. If a client in a mobile context does not convert, she leaves that shopping cart behind. The reason why that conversion didn’t happen could crop up somewhere else. So it’s important to have visibility into that complete stream of data,” Sajor said. “For example, that reason could crop up in a Facebook comment about how she happened to be near the store, walked in, looked and said, ‘Gosh, that’s really a terrible pink and I hated it. And it didn’t look anything like what I saw on the mobile device or what I saw on the Web site.’ So it’s a question of looking across the complete compendium of sources and understanding what they are and where she is likely to turn up. Looking at that complete data stream and doing that correlation. That’s probably a step beyond us today, but I think it’s pretty close.”


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Will Web Analytics Work For Mobile? Home Depot IT Chief: Most Retailers Are Behind, Think “We’ll Get To That Later”

  1. Doug Samstad Says:

    This article is really confusing to me. Are there really executives out there that don’t think web / mobile analytics are important? To say “the channel doesn’t matter” is ridiculous. That’s like saying, we shouldn’t listen to call center calls because it doesn’t matter. Or we shouldn’t do web analytics to understand where we have opportunities to improve our web site design. I wonder if some of these executives just don’t get it or they are confused with some other type of analytics.

  2. Mark Carleo Says:

    I don’t think anyone is saying analytics are not important or to ignore them. What I took away and agree with is that within each channel the consumer may behave differently but it is still the same consumer. If you only analyze the behavior of the consumer in each channel as a distinct individual you will come to the wrong conclusion about their behavior and why it changes from one channel to another. Aggregating behavior across channels and analyzing the differences as Mike Sajor suggests is the way to go but very challenging. The business strategy for a retail mobile commerce program will also skew the consumers behavior. Is the goal to sell directly on the mobile device and re-enforce impulse purchases or is it to drive traffic to the brick and mortar channel? Are you offering curated merchandise and events or pushing the complete product catalog? It may be too early to draw conclusions on mobile commerce behavior but data collection is a must and should be part of any mobile initiative.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.