advertisement
advertisement

Best Buy’s Last Hope: A Radical Reversal On Customer Service And Credibility

Written by Evan Schuman
April 11th, 2012

With Best Buy in between CEOs at the moment, many have taken to either writing Best Buy’s obituary (move over CircuitCity, your kid brother’s coming) or predicting that it will turn itself around with price cuts to fight Amazon.

Whether Best Buy has a long-term future in retail is an open question, but it certainly won’t get there with a price war against a well-resourced E-tail giant. Our unsolicited advice: Best Buy has one shot—an expensive, painful, highly disruptive shot—to truly turn itself around. It must embrace customer service in-store to an extent that would make Nordstrom, Trader Joe’s and Whole Foods blush. That means store associates who are true experts in the electronics they are selling. In short, it means beating Amazon not with price cuts—which would only reinforce a cheap quality reputation while gutting already thin margins—but by delivering the type of buying advice and pleasant environment that Amazon can’t touch.

Let’s get this dealt with upfront. This suggestion would be extremely disruptive. It would likely mean firing a huge percentage of associates and then replacing them with much geekier—and better paid—people. (Used the term “fired” rather than “laid off,” because it’s hard to call it a layoff if you’re immediately hiring someone else to replace the first worker and doing so at a higher salary.)

Discussed the Best Buy situation the other day with an analyst who said that Best Buy has huge staying power because of its dominant position within the hot personal electronics category. That’s true, but it comes with multiple footnotes. First, with CircuitCity’s departure, there aren’t a lot of large electronics-focused chains left.

More importantly, though, if you’re trying to fight Amazon and you get to choose one category to own, consumer electronics is probably the last one you’d want to choose. Apparel has some game, given the texture and fit issues involved. Large appliances and furniture are also good choices, as few consumers want to have Amazon ship them a refrigerator or a couch.

Consumer electronics, though, is decided on price and speed. Amazon can afford a larger stock, better pricing and effortless purchases. But what if a shopper is confused about which device to purchase? The best Amazon can offer in that case is lots of online reviews, which can take time to review. But those reviews are also a source with dubious credibility. That said, today’s typical Best Buy associate also has dubious credibility. What if that changed?

What if Best Buy was staffed by experienced associates with expertise in consumer electronics? What if consumers wanted to drive to Best Buy to get counsel, see demos and never be met with a hard sales pitch?

Beyond the cost and the corporate disruption, Best Buy has a reputation hurdle to overcome. Although consumers trust retail associates little, a series of Best Buy customer relations catastrophes has made consumers trust the chain much less. Reversing that would indeed be dramatic. Is it doable? The move would certainly be expensive. Then again, so is bankruptcy.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Best Buy’s Last Hope: A Radical Reversal On Customer Service And Credibility

  1. Todd Michaud Says:

    I am surprised that the fact that Stephen Gillett being named EVP of Global Business Services hasn’t gotten more attention. As the former CIO and Head of Digital Ventures for Starbucks, Stephen has a great track-record of disruptive innovation and is just what Best Buy needs.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.