advertisement
advertisement

Will Warranty Enforcement Be Amazon Marketplace’s Achilles’ Heel?

Written by Evan Schuman
August 13th, 2013

When it comes to competing against Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) or even Japan’s Rakuten, one of the more challenging aspects is their third-party marketplaces, which give each a seemingly endless inventory at minimal risk. But the odds may be getting more even, as shoppers are starting to notice that some manufacturers are strictly enforcing their authorized reseller rules.

The immediate impact on shoppers is they may find that the expensive flat-screen TV, surround-sound speakers or refrigerator that looked like such a bargain on Amazon voids the warranty. The arguably unrealistic expectation from consumer goods manufacturers—which sharply strengthens the hands of traditional e-tailers trying to fight against these third-party marketplaces—is that shoppers would not only notice the actual name of the merchant shipping the item, but would take the time to run that name on the manufacturer’s site to see if they are truly an authorized reseller. Or they could just make the purchase from Target.com or Bestbuy.com and know for certain.

In a recent example cited by Consumer Reports’ Consumerist site, a shopper bought some Klipsch headphones from Amazon (unknown to the shopper at the time, it was really a third-party merchant) and the headphones shortly broke, due to no consumer negligence. The e-mail he sent to the manufacturer—republished in part at Consumerist—nicely summed up the problem: “I bought it from Amazon.com so I didn’t think twice. Frankly, consumers shouldn’t have to check a manufacturer’s website to verify they are purchasing from an authorized reseller. I am at a loss as to how a product that I purchase sealed in a new box would fail to qualify for a warranty.”

Amazon, always wise when it comes to detecting a potential Achilles’ Heel for its lucrative third-party community (both in terms of profit as well as research opportunities), agreed to accept a return of that product for that particular consumer. It’s unclear if that is Amazon’s policy for all shoppers.

If so, though, that would make for an excellent policy. It could simply say “Amazon stands behinds any products that you buy through Amazon. If the manufacturer’s warranty doesn’t apply, ours will. Buy from Amazon confidently.”

There are lots of products that consumers will purchase without any serious long-term warranty expectations—used books, exotic spices, cables, etc. By long term, I mean that if the product works when it arrives, all is good. (To be clear, if a used book arrives all torn up, Amazon would likely issue an immediate refund. The idea of warranty here is to cover problems that happen weeks or months later.) That expectation is crucial to a TV or a lawn-mower, though.

Getting back to the competitive issue, perception—as always—trumps reality. If enough stories crop up about various manufacturers refusing to cover warranties on unopened product boxes—something that is absolutely within those manufacturers’ rights—this could pose a very serious threat to various third-party marketplaces.

This isn’t entirely great news for the Walmarts, Targets and Best Buys of the world, as many venerable brick-and-mortar chains are looking hard at whether incorporating such third-party environments would make sense for them, helping in their infinite inventory efforts. In other words, be careful spreading the dangers about third-party merchant environments until you are really certain that you won’t be in that business six months from now.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Will Warranty Enforcement Be Amazon Marketplace’s Achilles’ Heel?

  1. Nathan Says:

    I buy most of my nerd toys on Amazon and I had never stopped to consider that I may be shooting myself in the foot in terms of warranties. I’ll have to make a point of checking the seller’s info to confirm they are authorized distributors (at least for high-ticket items).

    Thanks for the head’s up!

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.