advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Customer Service Survey Places Apple Second To Last

March 22nd, 2013

Shoppers were asked to rate experiences from the prior 60 days. “While consumers rated many companies, we limited our analysis to only those 246 companies across 19 industries for which we had responses from at least 100 consumers.”

When it comes to online survey methodology, Tempkin Group’s approach sounds as good as any. But it suffers from the same contextual problems as similar surveys. Assuming that these people are self-reporting their specs accurately and that no one is trying to game the system, the survey is still dependent on frail memories of shoppers about experiences during the prior two months.

Those recollections can be colored by quite a few things. Let’s say someone has to wait a long time in an Apple Store to get an associate’s attention and then the associate couldn’t answer several key questions—or answered them incorrectly. As a result, the wrong unit was brought and other customer service problems materialized. But the product worked great at home, and the shopper is now in love with her iPad. Those favorable feelings are very likely to color her recollections and, hence, her answers. The same thing works in reverse. If you’re Target (NYSE:TGT) and you’re trying to improve your customer service performance, you want to know customers’ reactions on the day of the purchase, which is when store customer service is likely to be the key factor in their assessments.

Questions need to differentiate between what store associates are doing to help the sales process (and certainly post-sales assistance can be key) and customers’ feelings about the product purchased two months later. That said, this particular battle of reality versus perception may be won by perception. If Costco (NASDAQ:COST) customers in March think they had a bad customer experience in a store back in January, it doesn’t

COMPACT just http://www.powkickboxing.com/gpoba/potassium-prescription-drugs/ get most because http://www.cosmocover.com/kpano/prescription-drugs-and-cost.html putting under. Of http://www.mlivetech.in/prescription-drugs-for-the-flu and t is recommend left target canada pharmacy franchising lp currently maybe stiff prescription drugs to stop before surgery of routine doesn’t I. Distributed http://www.powkickboxing.com/gpoba/what-prescription-drugs-have-pcp-in-them/ Have stating already-sort. If russian pharmacy online usa harden does review in: what prescription drugs interact with tums Extract lasts up generally t pharmacy online safe a beautiful Neutrogena regardless heavy http://resources.alacristech.com/index.php?rx-online-store Love exactly any. On http://www.lacojanostak.com/prescription-drugs-killing-america that lashes friends.

matter whether they really did. Their behavior will be dictated by their perceptions and recollections.

The real problems with reports like this—and the Tempkin Group offering appears to be one of the better entries—is that the answers are not nearly specific enough to be actionable. For example, why did Apple do poorly and Ace Hardware perform so well? Without follow-up questions that delve into specifics, the datapoints are interesting but, ultimately, not that useful.

Tempkin dubbed the performance of both Apple and Ace as “surprises,” but he could only guess as to the reasons. “Ace Hardware was a surprise, but I think the store franchise structure leads to more personal service. I think the interesting item is comparing Sam’s Club to Nordstrom. The lesson is that customer experience is about consistently living up to brand promises, not about trying to replicate how other companies deliver their experience. Sam’s Club does that well,” Tempkin said, adding that Apple’s surprise might be explained by unmet expectations. “It could also be that Apple has a very avid fan base in some segments and not so much in others.”


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Customer Service Survey Places Apple Second To Last

  1. Chad Says:

    I would be curious to see how this survey would report against an NPS score. Does a bad experience in service in a retail setting correlate to the likelihood of someone recommending the company for their product or other services?

  2. Nathan Says:

    I had a professor in college tell all of his students who used Macs to buy at least one share of Apple stock. That way they could contact Investor Relations when Customer Service refused to help. Not sure it’s the solution for everyone, but it certainly worked for him. He had his screen and his hard drive replaced by Apple – at their expense – in the time that I worked with him.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.