advertisement
advertisement

Domino’s Tablet Testing: Make The App Into A Game

Written by Evan Schuman
June 21st, 2012

One of the challenges with a mobile app is figuring out if customers will actually use it. Domino’s has tackled that challenge by launching its app first as a game. Not only does this approach give a strong indication of customer interest—pre-rollout—but it also is a practical way to debug. And if the initial version is buggy? Customers are much more tolerant of a buggy game than something with true E-Commerce functionality.

Domino’s had an additional challenge: this is an app for tablets, combining screen space close to that of a desktop with the touchscreen of a tablet. What the pizza chain came up with is a way for consumers to make their own pizzas, with the touch intensity and finger distance used dictating how the dough will come up, whether the slices are cut uniformly and how evenly distributed toppings are. It’s a game—for now.

“Tablets are on an ever-increasing trajectory,” said Dennis Maloney, Domino’s VP for multimedia marketing. “Consumers are going to expect a different experience with a different form factor.”

This game, called Pizza Hero, is indeed just a game. But there are very practical elements at play here. From a “what can it do?” perspective, this is an easy way to test how effective the tablet’s touchscreen is for tactile tasks. From a “what are consumers willing to do?” perspective, the game provides ton of concrete feedback.

Maybe this could be a fun way to order complicated pizzas in the future, such as “two slices with pineapple, three slices with pepperoni, one slice with extra cheese.” Will customers bother? Will they actually find it fun? What better way to discover the answers than through a game?

For complex orders, could this approach be more efficient than choosing from multiple categories and then still not getting it right? Back in the human-filled kitchen, might a high-resolution picture of what the customer wants make orders more accurate? Could this support eventual automation, with machinery dropping the toppings precisely as the customer did?


advertisement

4 Comments | Read Domino’s Tablet Testing: Make The App Into A Game

  1. Greg Lucas Says:

    Customers want to order – not play a game. My favorite part of this ad campaign is when Domino’s says “if you are good enough we will offer you a job.” How many of their potential employees own an iPad? 1?

  2. Evan Schuman Says:

    On the specific point you’re making–how many of their potential employees own an iPad?–it’s not that cut and dry. Beyond that it could be any tablet (many Android tablets cost a lot less), the potential applicant need not own it. If you expand it to anyone who has a family member–or a friend or relative–who has a tablet, the universe becomes a lot larger. Anyone can go into an Apple store (or some of their distribution partners, although Apple is more lenient than others) and play with an iPad there. It’s therefore not as limiting as you suggest.
    But that’s not really the point. I doubt it’s seen as a recruitment tool any more than it’s a training system. It’s goal is to test how people interact with such an app and whether indeed they will interact with it at all. It’s market testing. Looked at from that perspective, it’s a pretty powerful effort.
    As for customers wanting to order, not play a game, agreed. But the functionality to order is still there, so this shouldn’t take away from it. And this could help refine future new ways to order.

  3. Greg Lucas Says:

    I see. You think when people use a friend / relative’s tablet or go into the apple store they will prioritize playing the Domino’s game over the thousands of better / real games available.

  4. Evan Schuman Says:

    Thanks, Greg, and no, I don’t think many will do that. But was merely pointing out that the universe of people who could do this game is larger than the universe of people who personally own Apple or Android tablets. Have personally witnessed a lot of people in their early 20s playing games on the iPads of friends or family members. That all said, this very debate is the point. This is a nice–relatively low cost–technique to help Domino’s determine if customers are likely to use this or not. If the game does well despite the limits on the number of available tablets, it will indicate strong interest and openness to this approach. And if hardly anyone bothers to try it–or they try it once and never try again–that’s great info, too.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.