advertisement
advertisement

Microsoft’s Tablet Move: Not For Retail

Written by Frank Hayes
June 20th, 2012

The tablet is quickly becoming the most interesting piece of retail hardware around, with the iPad getting as close as possible to having already cornered the in-store market. But it’s not a done deal yet. Microsoft on Monday (June 18) set out to prove that retailers have alternatives to Apple for tablets and that Microsoft still matters. Unfortunately, it ended up proving the opposite—for both.

First off, the product announced is a terrible idea. Publicized in a rush, for some reason, it has a flat keyboard, a borrowed name and a severely limited retail channel. It’s heavier than an iPad, less comfortable to hold and explicitly designed to stand on a desk. Microsoft is saying pricing will be comparable to Ultrabooks, which ain’t cheap. In fact, Microsoft is calling it a PC, not a tablet. Microsoft also is not showing any software for it, except to say that it’ll only run software from the Windows Store.

Everything about this tablet looks like somebody at Microsoft thought they could Frankenstein together two business models and no one would notice. Given that retailers aren’t buying a lot of Android tablets for in-store mobile use, they won’t buy this offering. (The low Android tablet pricepoint was supposed to be pushing tons of these units in-store. That’s happening with smaller chains, but the majors still seem to be sticking with Apple.)

The whole announcement is the most bizarre thing I’ve ever seen from Redmond—which is saying quite a bit. The press event was kept secret until days before. The venue for the news conference wasn’t announced until six hours before it started. There were no review units and almost no hands-on time for reporters. The news release gushes about its advanced industrial design, “conceived, designed and engineered entirely by Microsoft employees, and building on the company’s 30-year history manufacturing hardware” (yeah, when I hear “Microsoft,” I immediately think of classy hardware design).

And it’s only going to be sold in the 25 Microsoft Stores that will be open by then and “select” online Microsoft Stores. Select Microsoft online stores? Forget Target, Costco or Walmart. Microsoft can’t let it be purchased from all of its own sites? Somehow, I don’t think Apple’s sweating this one.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Microsoft’s Tablet Move: Not For Retail

  1. tks Says:

    Everything about (the Microsoft rollout) is completely different from the iPad and groundbreaking. BTW, hands on is now happening EVERYWHERE with journalists. It’s called limiting your product to generate a buzz. It obviously got you writing about it so I’d say mission accomplished.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.