advertisement
advertisement

PayPal’s Price-Match Program Is Fishing For Your Shoppers In Your Stores

Written by Evan Schuman
November 8th, 2012

Price-match programs have, for decades, been a standard tool for retaining existing customers and potentially attracting tire-kickers by giving them a reason to not fear your pricing. But PayPal is creatively using the program to acquire new customers, and it is using its retail partners’ ludicrous price-match restrictions as the path to do it.

At a glance, retailers might be inclined to dismiss this price match as something akin to what Visa, MasterCard, American Express or Diner’s Club might offer and not at all related to what a retail chain might do. Although PayPal is indeed a payment device, its in-store retail efforts—where PayPal offers to handle POS purchases at Home Depot, JCPenney, Abercrombie & Fitch, Toys”R”Us, Foot Locker and Barnes & Noble, among others—make it something that can’t be so easily dismissed. For the doubters out there, note that the program stresses it covers both in-store and online purchases.

From PayPal’s perspective, this is a potential goldmine. The program is only slated to run from November 1 through December 31—and it does the usual exclusion of Thanksgiving, Black Friday and Cyber Monday one-day sales—so its calendar exposure is capped, but the names of new customers last forever.

Speaking of exposure limits, this program shares a lot with rebate psychology. Most customers won’t bother to use the rebates, but they’ll appreciate that the price protections are there. How many customers will bother to see if someone else is charging less after they’ve made a purchase? And to then find an ad somewhere to prove it, fill out a non-tiny form and attach the evidence? And to provide full name, address, phone number, E-mail address, full item name and description, brand, purchase price, model number, purchase date and PayPal transaction ID? And to then scan in and attach the itemized receipt, along with the copy of the ad showing the lower price. Oh, and they have only 10 days after the ad runs to file all this material. And the refund is capped at $250 per item and $1,000 total. The sale date must also be within 30 days after the purchase.

If you think this approach is a great way to get PayPal to cover the price matches of your customers, thereby relieving you of the cost, don’t bother. PayPal is one step ahead of you. From its terms and conditions: “The Price-Match benefit is supplemental to, and excess of, any valid and collectible avenue of recovery which is available to you, the eligible account holder. We will refund the excess amount once all other coverage has been exhausted up to the limit of liability.” And it specifically references retail price-match programs.

But PayPal added a few really nice pluses: It will cover the cost of return shipping and, the big one, there are no practical restrictions on which retailers—online or off—can be used for the price match. That is, of course, huge.

PayPal needs to give shoppers reasons to use PayPal instead of other payment options, and this is a powerful argument. And once many of your customers are using—and insisting on—PayPal, you’re going to find that they suddenly have acquired a lot more clout.

PayPal’s deal with Discover raises the possibility of PayPal eventually being accepted at millions of retail locations. That’s going to get PayPal in the middle of your stores in a major way. This price-match deal is its way of trying to make your customers PayPal customers.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read PayPal’s Price-Match Program Is Fishing For Your Shoppers In Your Stores

  1. Philip Cohen Says:

    PayPal’s Price-Match Program is, in fact, a sign of utter desperation. Now that Visa’s “professional online digital wallet, V.me, is up and running, the clunky PreyPal is, except for its mandated use on the atrophying eBafia marketplace, effectively dead in the water. If I recognise nothing else, this announcement of “price matching” from the eBafia/PreyPal Dept of Spin represents the desperate irregular breathing of a couple of dying enterprises.

  2. Mark Goldstein Says:

    Price match is a good idea but it definitely didnt get above the noise. Phillip–PayPal might be clunky but so is that old 1965 Mustang in your garage that you love to drive…it works, its registered to your bank and its a first mover. V.me has a long road to hike before its relevant…

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.