advertisement
advertisement

Target Using QR Codes To Enable Surreptitious Santas

Written by Evan Schuman
October 4th, 2012

Target on Wednesday (Oct. 3) unveiled an in-store chain-wide QR trial that will simultaneously test almost unlimited inventory of a handful of the season’s hottest toys and whether shoppers would like to avoid purchase lines in exchange for multi-day shipping delays, in addition to assessing a suggestion that this option can be used to hide gift purchases from curious young eyes. Not bad for some cheap QR code stickers.

Given all of those interesting attributes being tested, the trial—which starts October 14—is going to have to extrapolate data from an unusually small product sample: 20 toys that will be featured on endcaps. Granted, those are literally the expected 20 hottest toys from this upcoming holiday season. But it’s still only 20. That’s statistically tiny within a store with an average of 70,000 SKUs.

The idea is that shoppers will scan the endcap displays with a smartphone and then the product will be sent to the shopper’s home—or any destination desired, such as the relative’s house where they expect to be on the day of gift opening—for free.

The free shipping is a very nice touch, as it negates one of the two downsides to in-store online purchases: shipping costs and shipping delays. “Target.com standard shipping is 3 to 5 days and that’s our default checkout setting for online orders,” said Target spokesperson Eddie Baeb late on Wednesday. “I’m still researching to determine/confirm 100 percent that standard shipping is the option that will be used with this campaign when it goes live October 14.”

But the inventory aspect of this trial is potentially the most interesting. This is a big step beyond “if we don’t have it in stock, just buy it from our Web site.” The idea of scanning a QR code that automatically gets the customer to a specific part of the site, autopopulates the scanned product and then automatically includes the free shipping code radically accelerates and facilitates the in-store purchase process.

The shopper still must manually key in the desired address and payment data. That task is hardly holiday ho-ho-ho happy when it means thumbing info into a smartphone in the middle of the pushing and shoving of holiday crowds.

The question being tested: Will customers see this QR code entry into the Web site as fast and easy? Will it address the problem of stores running out of precisely the most popular gift items?

Will it be a nice way to let shoppers who just want that one gift to avoid long checkout lines? The free shipping comes back into play here, too. If customers simply purchase the toys online from home, they would have to pay shipping. So will this freebie give those desktop shoppers a reason to come into the store instead? And, once there, perhaps see something else they like?

It’s indeed a fascinating concept. But limiting the trial to 20 items seems to undercut the analytical value of whatever data is generated. With an average of 70,000 products, would a QR trial of 7,000 products have been more helpful? Heck, how about 700 products?


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Target Using QR Codes To Enable Surreptitious Santas

  1. ed Says:

    By using in-store QR codes, Target may reduce the effects showrooming by focusing the mobile device on in-store options rather than external competitor e-commerce sites.

  2. Evan Schuman Says:

    True. Or they could just as easily increase showrooming by encouraging shoppers to do it and making it easier, more comfortable, for them. But I’d argue that none of this is particularly important. Mobile will become a standard part of shopper interactions so there’s no way to prevent customers from shopping around. The best technique is the 100-year-old one: courteous and well-informed associates and plenty of them; the right assortment; better prices; better experience. In short, if you just do your job properly, showrooming will be little more than a minor irritant. If it’s much more than that, you probably have bigger problems than mobile integration.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.