advertisement
advertisement

Walmart Same-Day Trial: Can Dec. 24 Be E-tail Windfall?

Written by Evan Schuman
October 10th, 2012

Move over in-store mobile integration. It seems that same-day delivery is the coolest retail fad this holiday season, with Walmart this week joining Amazon and eBay (which are doing it) and Macy’s (which is seriously considering it), having figured out an impressively low-cost way of doing so.

Walmart’s effort is impressive, despite a handful of site hiccups we encountered, including a revolving-door customer service number and price warnings that seem at odds with the chain’s pricing policy. The big test will come on December 24. Given the huge financial value placed on every holiday shopping day, it’s interesting that many holiday shoppers are forced to give up online shopping after about December 19 or 20, due to shipping delays. Could a robust same-day delivery program make December 24 fully E-Commerce viable? (Have I been known to drive to the mall at 11:00 PM on December 24 for a last-minute forgotten gift? No comment.)

It’s not clear for this year’s trials what the Christmas Eve policies will be for any of these retailers, but the fiscal potential for future years is definite.

Walmart’s approach fits squarely in between the approach being trialed by Amazon, which is only available to customers paying extra for Amazon Prime service, and the methods being tested by eBay, where each delivery will cost shoppers $5 after they use three fully free deliveries.

The key questions of any same-day delivery are: “How early must I place an order for same-day delivery?” “How quickly will it get here?” “At what cost?” “What types of product limitations are there?” The three early players have all taken very different routes on all these issues.

  • How Early Must The Order Be Placed?
    Amazon has been the most strict, insisting that same-day orders in two of its test cities must be placed by 7:00 AM local time. Walmart’s cutoff is a much more leisurely noon local time for each of its four test metro regions: Philadelphia, Minneapolis, northern Virginia and a chunk of northern California from San Jose to San Francisco. eBay’s approach doesn’t have a concrete cutoff time, because couriers are dispatched throughout the day.
  • How Much Will It Cost?
    Amazon’s price starts with shoppers having to pay $79 per year to join Amazon Prime, and it then charges $8.99 for same-day delivery (a giftcard costs only $3.99). eBay has various incentive discounts, but it then settled on $5 each. Walmart is charging a flat $10.
  • How Quickly Will This Same-Day Delivery Arrive?
    To be precise, we have no field testing of how long these services are actually taking to do deliveries, so the comparisons are merely based on the program claims. Amazon isn’t promising delivery until 8:00 PM. eBay is promising one hour after the order is placed (to be handled by courier). Walmart is promising a four-hour window, at the customer’s choice, with the earliest window being 4:00 PM to 8:00 PM. In effect, that means its promise is the same as Amazon’s: 8:00 PM. Walmart’s deliveries are all being handled by UPS.
  • Eligible Product Limitations?
    This is a much more difficult comparison, given the different ways the initial players have structured their programs. Walmart has released a clean figure: 5,000 of what it considers its most popular items in electronics, music, toys, movies and books. Not coincidentally, this campaign is intended for the holidays, so these are the most gift-oriented items. (A different Walmart same-day delivery that’s been done in California focused on grocery.) The eBay and Amazon programs are more dependent on what retail and consumer goods partners are pushing.

  • advertisement

    One Comment | Read Walmart Same-Day Trial: Can Dec. 24 Be E-tail Windfall?

    1. Earl Says:

      Any day but Dec 24th makes same-day viable, but that one day just want cut it from a logistics perspective…consumers can forget about it…

    Leave a Reply

    Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
    Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

    Newsletters

    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
    advertisement

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    StorefrontBacktalk
    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.