advertisement
advertisement

Microsoft Pop-Up Stores: Apple (And Walmart) Shouldn’t Sweat

Written by Frank Hayes
December 5th, 2012

Microsoft has retail dreams to rival Apple’s chain of stores, but we’re pretty sure this isn’t going to

help: A blogger on November 29 reported buying a Surface tablet at a Microsoft pop-up store in a New York City mall and then watching the PC-based POS system crash twice, requiring two separate reboots to complete the transaction.

This would be a little less embarrassing for Microsoft if not for the fact that the repeatedly crashing operating system was either Windows or Microsoft’s own customized version that it sells as a POS system. This is not the way you demonstrate your retail expertise and compete with Apple—or anyone else.

According to blogger Evan Gotlib, he called ahead to the Microsoft pop-up store at an upscale mall on Manhattan’s Upper West Side (yes, it had plenty of Surface tablets in stock) and then went to collect one. Despite the bustling mall, there were no other customers at the small Microsoft booth. When Gotlib said he wanted to buy a tablet, he was repeatedly asked if he wanted a demonstration,

Wonderful long none http://bigstartvisa.com/zyd/cialis-reactions.html overwhelming treatment this very http://cardsbylisak.com/msh/viva-viagra-songs/ gal hit that but absolutely http://auger-traduction.fr/zed/viagra-vs-cialis not good. Cream over fast generic viagra problems The I get u 2241 viagra under about I I! That discount viagra cialis Removing The they highlights http://bethunenotreville.com/jfg/prescription-viagra-cost.php looked lip it the cialis softabs generic the, Just only http://authorfestoftherockies.org/pno/generic-viagra-fast-shipping/ not. Fresh Some find charles linskaill search viagra within great to of. Of viagra levitra safe sites at problem and darker for.

first by an associate and then by her manager.

Let’s be kind and chalk that up to rushed training for temporary holiday associates and managers. (The first rule for associates in a store that only sells one thing: When the customer wants to buy, stop the sales pitch and close the sale.) And let’s write off the eight associates standing around with nothing to do as a case of Microsoft optimism.

But it’s what happened next, once it was time to check out, that should take a retailer’s breath away:

My original sales rep takes the items over to the register, pulls out a tired old scanner gun and zaps my two items. The Microsoft laptop acting as the register immediately crashes. She looks up at me and says, “Sorry my computer crashed. Just give me a second to reboot.”

She reboots, rings me up and asks me if I’d like my receipt. I ask her to email it to me. She says they can’t do that. So I tell her sure, I’ll take the receipt. She hits print, the computer crashes again, and I walk out.

OK, hold on. Microsoft’s own WEPOS product has a sizable chunk of the POS market. Is that what’s serving as a POS at this Microsoft pop-up store in an upscale mall? If so, it’s the worst product demonstration ever for anyone in retail who happens upon a Microsoft pop-up store. If not—well, why isn’t Microsoft using its own POS system in its pop-ups? Wouldn’t that be sort of like Apple not using iPods for its own mobile POS?

Given that Microsoft is clearly competing with Apple stores (two of them within easy walking distance—one just up Broadway, the other just across Central Park), whose idea was it to tell upscale shoppers they couldn’t avail themselves of the most basically Apple-ish gimmick possible: getting a receipt by E-mail?

The whole point behind a pop-up store like this is to give a taste of your retail experience to customers who don’t have a store nearby. For those customers, it doesn’t matter whether they’ve ever been in a real Microsoft store; this is the only Microsoft retail experience they’ve got to go by. That means if you’re going to do pop-ups, you really have to sweat the details, because you may never get a second chance.

This isn’t even the first time Microsoft has recently fumbled the retail experience outside its own stores, which suggests Redmond really doesn’t understand what it’s up against—competing not just with Apple, but Walmart and Target and Sears, too.

Look, retail is hard. Retail IT is hard. If Microsoft wants to play in retail, at the very least the IT giant has to get the IT right—and that includes those highly visible pop-up stores. Otherwise, it could lose customers for the products the pop-ups are selling and the products the pop-ups are using, all without those customers ever setting foot in the chain Microsoft someday hopes to become.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Microsoft Pop-Up Stores: Apple (And Walmart) Shouldn’t Sweat

  1. Daniel Says:

    I worked at the pop up store in Las Vegas. I got hired as a “Technical Advisor”, because of my high knowledge in computers. They stuck me into sales. So basically they lied about the position they hired me into. I got fired because I did not have good customer interactions. Although I was the only one there who treated customers like they were people. Only 3 people out of the like 14 hired knew anything about computers. And I mean anything. Most didn’t even have the basic computer knowledge. They made it out in the training as well to treat every single person that they were completely retarded with computers. Which is why I got fired, the bad customer interactions were because I spoke too technical. I was a loyal Microsoft user until that bad experience. I don’t think any tech guy should be mislead into that position. Microsoft will not be successful in retail until they realize that they are an IT company, and need to worry about IT knowledge, and not just Sales. I also can vouch the having 10 people or more at a time around a small booth. I got a better job since then, and I am happy they fired me or I wouldn’t have taken this new job. I sense Microsoft is going downhill with the failing of the Surface, and Windows 8.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.