advertisement
advertisement

NRF And EPC’s Swipe-Fee Flame War: Full Of Sound And Fury, Signifying Nothing

Written by Frank Hayes
February 6th, 2013

The NRF and the Electronic Payments Coalition (EPC) have launched what is essentially a flame war over the swipe surcharges that are allowed under the interchange settlement as of January 27. NRF launched the first broadside, calling surcharges a “ridiculous concept” and deriding “propaganda” suggesting any retailer would use them. EPC fired back on Tuesday (Feb. 5), calling NRF’s statements “false and misleading.”

This isn’t complicated—the retailers most likely to adopt swipe-fee surcharges are the ones currently offering discounts for using cash, and that group doesn’t include most big chains. But NRF is also fighting the interchange settlement and EPC is supporting it, which goes a long way to explain some otherwise pretty incomprehensible flaming.

First came news stories last month announcing that, as of January 27, merchants could start adding a surcharge for transactions using a credit or debit card under terms of the interchange settlement. Then came follow-up stories with predictable denials by Walmart Walmart (NYSE:WMT), Target (NYSE:TGT), Macy’s (NYSE:M) and Sears (NASDAQ:SHLD) saying that they weren’t going to slap customers with a new fee.

Then NRF weighed in with a January 30 statement. “The ridiculous concept that merchants will start surcharging on any widespread basis is propaganda being spread by the card industry in an attempt to divert attention from their skyrocketing swipe fees,” said NRF General Counsel Mallory Duncan. “We have discussed the settlement with many of our members and other merchants, and not a single one has said they will surcharge.”

NRF also described the surcharge as “theoretically allowed” by the settlement. “National and regional chains don’t want to surcharge and probably couldn’t,” Duncan added.

On Tuesday (Feb. 5), EPC returned fire to correct “false and misleading statements made recently by the National Retail Federation,” including NRF’s argument that chains don’t want to surcharge. “Is it true, as stated by the NRF, that merchants and their trade organizations did not want the ability to surcharge? No, that is not true. Both merchants and trade organizations demanded the option of surcharging as part of the settlement agreement.”

The EPC statement went on: “Previously, both Visa (NYSE:V) and MasterCard (NYSE:MA) had longstanding rules that prohibited this practice, and reluctantly gave up this ‘No Surcharge Rule’ as a compromise in order to settle the lawsuit. In fact, retailers have been asking for the ability to surcharge for years, as stated in testimony before Congress, in letters to California in relation to its surcharging ban, and outlined in the settlement agreement.”

Of course, neither NRF or EPC are owning up to the obvious: Customers are already paying swipe fees.


advertisement

One Comment | Read NRF And EPC’s Swipe-Fee Flame War: Full Of Sound And Fury, Signifying Nothing

  1. Dennis Says:

    As a Visa/Mastercard MSP/ISO, all the calls we have received to date, from our merchants have been in the “When can I start surcharging, and how can I do it”? category. These are all small businesses that have been bearing the costs of Interchange and PCI without being able to pass on the additional costs to their customers. OF COURSE Wal-Mart will not want to do it, but the small brick-and-mortar, or mom-and-pop operations want this desperately.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.