advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

PayPal’s Pitch To Retailers To Use Its Mobile Wallet: Making The Most Of A Few Temporary Differences

November 3rd, 2011

I think it’s fair to say that smartphones—defined these days as phones that can download third-party apps—are where this battle will be fought. As a practical matter, RIM’s BlackBerry has opted to sit this out in the U.S., which is fine, given that it has not been on the list of mobile-payment partner candidates—or even the list for mobile-site-optimized platforms—for most retailers for quite some time.

That really leaves Android and Apple. As the owner of Android, Google has a lock there, and Apple still hasn’t shown its hand. Apple may cut a deal with Google or it may make its own move, which could make it the player to beat.

PayPal is correct that it’s the only currently discussed option that can process digital wallet payments through Android, Apple and BlackBerry.

It’s a strong argument, but it’s sharply hampered by the calendar. Google has multiple public trials active right now. PayPal has none now and is promising to have a single national retail partner by the end of this year (mostly likely this month, probably to go live right before Thanksgiving). Given the trial is unidentified, that doesn’t give much of a push—nor does the fact that it’s just a single chain.

More at issue is that Apple will likely make its move within the next several months. Because of the slow PayPal rollout, retailers will have the luxury of sitting back and waiting to see what Apple does before making any firm decisions.

Smaller chains—plus tons of mom-and-pop single-location retailers—will have an easier time. And PayPal’s device-agnostic pitch could make it a strong force there, with Google focusing much more on the major national chains. PayPal’s popularity with smaller retailers, especially online, could also prove critical. In turn, that could help PayPal build out the rest of its infrastructure with thousands of small shops across the country.

Until then, PayPal’s pop-up will be making its pitches among the bundled holiday shoppers for several more weeks. One of the demos—which PayPal calls vignettes, most likely because that was what was needed to get the professional actors to participate (performing a vignette goes on a resume, doing a demo doesn’t)—had an interesting moment.

The presenter is pointing out the joy of having completed a digital transaction of a barbecue grill at a hardware store, all without a sales rep bothering him with upsell attempts. But within a minute, he’s pointing out that the app is now flagging some important grill accessories that he should really consider adding to his purchase. Yes, why have an annoying sales associate trying to upsell you when your iPhone can do it instead?


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.