advertisement
advertisement

Queue Busting May Be More Effective Than Initially Thought, Thanks To Line Psychology

Written by Evan Schuman
June 27th, 2012

The idea of using mobile POS devices to queue bust is not a new concept, but the belief has always—logically enough—been that the line will accelerate solely based on how many shoppers can be checked out with the mobile units. But, bizarrely enough, one MPOS vendor has discovered that the units are accelerating all of the lines, not merely the ones where the mobile units are being used.

Here’s how that magic works: A couple of MPOS-armed associates approach some of the overflowing lines and announce that if anyone has a payment card and would like to be checked out with a mobile device to please say so, said Jerry Rightmer, president of mobile POS vendor Starmount.

Clearly, any customer who the associates process (they typically start near the front of the line) will cause that line to shorten. But what Rightmer hadn’t expected was that the MPOS announcement would cause almost everyone in all of the lines to take out their payment card, in the hope of being checked out faster. It’s the act of having their payment card in hand that accelerated the lines quite a bit beyond what a couple of MPOS-enabled associates could possibly do.

It’s yet another wonderful example of unanticipated consequences. No matter how much testing is done, technology deployed invariably will impact—and influence—shoppers in unimaginable ways. It’s not quite the butterfly effect, but it’s close.

Think about how digital shopping devices increased basket sizes, because shoppers on a tight budget spent more. The reason: Those shoppers tended to round up prices in their heads, so a $100 budget would translate to a roughly $93—$94 purchase. When the computer calculated everything to the penny and did not round up, the average purchase for those same $100-budget shoppers averaged much closer to $97—$98.

Or IHL’s wonderful self-checkout diet plan. That’s when the research firm figured out self-checkout customers were so absorbed with the self-checkout process that they didn’t focus on the impulse items in the lane and impulse item revenue plummeted. (The diet part? Many of those impulse purchases were candy.)

Chains are just now starting to discover the impacts of MPOS and consumers widely using mobile. What about mobile payment? If—OK, when—that takes hold, how will that impact purchases in unintended ways?

As for queue busting, the moral of the story is that technology can help move lines a little, but legions of unrealistically optimistic customers will do a lot more good. It’s sort of like the economy.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Queue Busting May Be More Effective Than Initially Thought, Thanks To Line Psychology

  1. Greg Buzek Says:

    Something that can’t be lost here is if even if customers get to a suspended transaction mode, they are far less likely to abandon the order because of the line. They are one more step committed to the purchase. This is why some fast food restaurants build a curb around fast food drive-thru’s. Once someone places the order they are locked in. So in mobile case, psychology brings a portion of this.

  2. Shasur M Says:

    Mobile POS (MPOS) is more than a queue-busting solution. It reduces / eliminates POS desserts. Bringing the Point-oF-Sale to the Point of Service increases chances of cross-selling and up-selling.

    One wonderful point made in this article – Rounding Up the total sale . MPOS comes handy in this . A self-checkout App will be even effective.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.