advertisement
advertisement

ISIS Turns To Sleight-Of-Hand To Show Off Its Wallet. That’s Not Helping, Guys

Written by Frank Hayes and Evan Schuman
March 14th, 2012

It’s a time-honored tradition at tradeshows for vendors to use outlandish performers—acrobats, models, jugglers, comedians, etc.—to boost booth traffic. But the Hippocratic Oath of publicity is: First, do no harm. ISIS seems to have forgotten that rule in its struggle to gain a mobile wallet foothold, by referring to its show spokesperson as a “cyber illusionist” and its presentation as a “trick.” That’s not a confidence builder for a financial app.

ISIS has faced criticism for being overly vague and unable to articulate any significant differences—let alone advantages—over rivals such as Google Wallet and PayPal. Add the fact that ISIS is the only one of those three that hasn’t done a public trial, and the sensitivity of not appearing substantive should be huge.

Ideally, what ISIS wanted to do at its much-hyped event Tuesday (March 13)—where it officially debuted its mobile wallet—at the South by Southwest conference in Austin is go ultra-heavy on specifics. Geek ‘em out, throw out so many advantages, technical safeguards and wonderful features the others lacked that it radically would undermine their reputation as vague marketers.

So what did ISIS do instead? It used as its face at the booth someone who identified himself to the crowd as a “cyber illusionist.” (Let’s start here. It’s unlikely a team of linguists could have come up with a more-regrettable term than “cyber illusionist” for a mobile payments company trying to convince retailers that it is substantive and trustworthy.)

The cyber illusionist then began what he called a demo, but which he also referred to as a “trick.” Did anyone in marketing even try and vet this guy’s script? If the answer is “yes,” that explains a lot. (By the way, the “demo” wasn’t a demo, in that the presenter didn’t show how the payments would happen in the real world.)

The presentation involved three phones, a lot of fast shuffling and synchronized marketing videos. It was truly a cross between a slick PowerPoint and a Penn & Teller magic routine. There’s nothing wrong with that, unless you believe the best way to convince retailers you’re not slick and deceptive is to perform a multimedia version of three phone Monte.

Marketing is all about associating words and images with desired attributes. What words are conjured up by a magician calling himself a cyber illusionist and dubbing a mobile wallet presentation a “trick”? Illusion. Deception. What you see is not what you get. Smoke and mirrors. Shell game.

When it comes to mobile wallets, the issues of deployment are deadly serious. PCI security implications, having customers impacted by data privacy decisions, whether the wallet will hurt/help the retailer in growing marketshare are hardly matters that CIOs and CFOs can afford to take lightly.

Most importantly, though, is that it feeds the narrative that there are no serious differences with ISIS’ rivals. We asked earlier whether anyone in marketing was overseeing this. A better question might be: Was anyone overseeing this who was not in marketing?


advertisement

One Comment | Read ISIS Turns To Sleight-Of-Hand To Show Off Its Wallet. That’s Not Helping, Guys

  1. Chuck Phipps, AAP, CTP Says:

    The other glaring omission in their amusing demo was any clue about how to get it. I live in Austin and am trying to become an early-adopter for their announced testing period this year, crank up my NFC and start spending at participating merchants. Or so my un-acknowledged tweets have stated. What we need here is some serious marketing focus and some social media awareness.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.