advertisement
advertisement

PCI’s Potential Black Friday Nightmare

Written by Walter Conway
January 30th, 2013

A 403 Labs QSA, PCI Columnist Walt Conway has worked in payments and technology for more than 30 years, 10 of them with Visa.

October promises to be a big month for everyone involved with PCI, but maybe not for the expected reason. On Oct. 28, 2013, every payment application validated under Payment Application Data Security Standard (PA-DSS) version 1.2—and there are a lot of them—will see its validation expire. The applications will no longer be acceptable for new deployments, a potential nightmare for every retailer using a validated payment application. If a retailer has any payment app that glitches in early November, it could have far fewer—if any—choices as a replacement.

The problem: A large number of applications still haven’t been revalidated under PA-DSS 2.0. Given the time that has already elapsed, coupled with the human tendency to delay the unpleasant, we’re looking at a likely crush of last-minute validation renewal requests that could strain both PA-QSA and PCI SSC resources.

For retailers, this means applications that may still be secure won’t necessarily be supported by vendors. Much worse, this situation could create a huge backlog of applications to be evaluated by PA-QSAs and then approved by the PCI Council. That process will take weeks, and quite possibly months, to work through. Retailers should note that this is happening barely one month before Black Friday. Fear not, though. All of these problems can be averted if software vendors all act quickly, well ahead of deadline. (Editor’s Note: In other words, we’re all doomed.)

For retailers who do have a payment app that blows up right after the October 28 deadline—as Murphy’s Law demands—merchants will have three unpleasant choices: live with their current apps and patch what can be patched; deal exclusively with the potentially smaller set of software vendors who have already gotten revalidated and negotiate from a weakened position (because the vendor also knows you have very few choices); or take a risk and buy and implement a non-validated app and then hope you don’t get breached or caught. The retailer, in that last case, should insist on language promising an immediate free upgrade (if necessary) once the app has been approved.

Application vendors will work in the remaining nine months (I hope) to validate their expiring version 1.2 payment applications under PA-DSS version 2.0. To extend the expiry date of their applications, vendors must submit a new PA-DSS version 2.0 report on validation (ROV), which will extend the expiry date of the validated version of the payment application to October 2016.

The changes between PA-DSS version 1.2 requirements and those in version 2.0 may not have been substantial. What is new, however, is that PA-QSAs now have detailed ROV Reporting Instructions that they must follow.

The impact of the ROV Reporting Instructions is likely to result in increased rigor in the PA-QSA’s testing and reporting that may require additional time and effort to complete and document. The PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) appears to recognize the possible increased validation effort in its Frequently Asked Questions for Transition from v1.2 to v2.0, when the Council states: “We strongly advise that PA-QSAs and payment application vendors use the transition period to familiarize themselves with and prepare for the changes in the new Program Guide, particularly for pricing and processes, before submitting application ROVs, revalidations or changes to the Council for review.”

This increased rigor is good.


advertisement

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.