advertisement
advertisement

Tesco Really Doesn’t Like NFC

Written by Evan Schuman
April 26th, 2013

Near field communication (NFC) is retail’s whipping boy these days, with almost every analyst and vendor going out of their way to point out how poorly it’s done and how bleak the NFC future is. And although deep shopper apathy about NFC has justified many of those critiques, major chains—wanting to keep their options open—have hesitated in outright attacking NFC. That’s why a blistering critique from the world’s third largest chain, Tesco, is so potentially devastating.

“NFC was revolutionary 10 years ago but I think it just might have passed its sell-by date,” Lyndon Lee (Tesco Enterprise Consultant Architect) told attendees at a mobile payments conference in London this week, according to a report in NFC World. “Is mobile NFC at the right place, at the right time? I don’t see any real movement or activity. NFC usability is not really revolutionary and, for the general public, is it really that cool? I think the next generation won’t think it’s cool enough for them and they won’t use it. Mobile NFC is unappealing. Contactless cards, I have no doubt about. They work now and they have no difficulties, but mobile NFC is very challenging and not easy.” He also said “Mobile NFC payments have no value to us. It has lack of consumer experience and it is too complicated so I don’t see a future. It is a very stagnant market.”

One of the problems with NFC is that its hype piqued far earlier than did the technology. It was aggressively marketed by various players (Yes, we’re looking at you, Google Wallet) at a time when NFC-compatible phones were rare, when retailers supporting the technology were even more rare and when retail associates properly trained to work with shoppers on NFC were almost non-existent. Add to that the normal tech difficulties of any new wireless technology and you have shopper experiences that were decidedly negative. But that was OK because hardly any shoppers bothered to try.

The pragmatic problem with NFC is that other approaches are now available that deliver some—but not all—of the advantages that NFC promised, while being much less intrusive or disruptive. That was the beauty of PayPal’s and the Square approach. They may have been ho-hum in terms of the functionality offered for the largest chains, but they integrated easily and were relatively easy to use. When it’s being pitched to IT, those are non-trivial advantages.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Tesco Really Doesn’t Like NFC

  1. David Curtis Says:

    Mobie Payment through NFC is another example of over-promise and under-deliver. Whatever mobile payment technology wins will be the one that not only makes it easy for the consumer and cost effective for the merchant, but is also compelling enough to change the consumer’s behavior. Our current payment ecology in the United States is too ingrained culturally and any method that apsires to replace that ecology will need a significant disruptive advantage to move the consumer to change how they pay. At this moment, with over 3500 restaurant locations and untold millions of customers, none of them are breaking down our doors or lighting up my phone with demands for mobile payment options. To paraphrase “it is the consumer, stupid”. Without them driving the adoption, the rest is all “sound and fury, signifying nothing”. So far, all mobile payment solutions are tools looking for a problem to solve.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.