This is page 2 of:

Social Media To Cost 20 Percent Of Budget

September 30th, 2010

When I talked to SEC Founder Judy Mod about the “free, overnight success” myth surrounding social media that is being sold to so many marketers today, she told me that she tells senior executives they need to start thinking about social business in terms of budgeting—and to allocate 20 percent of their budgets to social media over the next three to five years.

“When they pick themselves off the floor from shock, I explain that the impact to business is that disruptive,” Mod said. “When you are talking about major budgets across many companies, you realize the disruption could be as impactful as many of the technology disruptions we have seen in the last few decades.”

Are you prepared to put 20 percent of your budget toward your social strategy? And are you ready to pitch the business case for making the investment in that social strategy to your executive team?

Well, a radical change like this does not come without some significant impact to IT. (Isn’t it all just about IT anyway?) I am a strong believer that the most critical element of this fundamental business shift will be the impact it has on how we capture, manage and consume data. I have been working diligently to design a new information architecture that will meet the needs of this new world.

A solid social strategy is not based on an iPhone app or a viral video. The folks who are hiring a “Twintern” to manage the reputation of their brand in the social space might get some short-term PR over the idea of hiring such a role. But the companies that embrace social media as the new PR—well, that’s a whole different ball of wax.

One of the biggest mistakes companies make when executing a social strategy is delegating strategy to junior people and then wondering why the firm doesn’t get a real value out of social media. How many “what were we thinking?” Web sites did we see in the 1990s? We also see companies silo their efforts in social media from their business initiatives.

At the end of the day, if your social strategy isn’t driven by your main business drivers, 90 percent of the value of “social” is left on the table. Bu the real disruptive threat is that you open the door for a competitor to leverage that 90 percent to lower its cost of customer acquisition at your expense.

My advice to everyone who is considering the next steps in a social strategy: Focus on doing business socially, not on doing social business. Start with a strategy. Then set goals. Next, build a plan. Execute it violently. Brag.

Term Of The Week: “Social Scrooge”—slang for business leaders who believe they must enforce tighter controls on social media than they do on the Web or in E-mail. “Our executives are a bunch of Social Scrooges. They have implemented a zero-tolerance policy about using Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter at work. There go my sales leads.”

What do you think? Leave a comment, or E-mail me at You can also follow me on Twitter: @todd_michaud.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.