advertisement
advertisement

Macy’s Statement Argues That IT Really Matters To Wall Street. Now If Only Wall Street Really Believed That

Written by Evan Schuman
September 14th, 2011

When Macy’s on Tuesday (Sept. 13) issued a statement summarizing a wide range of IT investments, including stores borrowing inventory from each other, a cosmetics kiosk, some tablet deployments, digital receipts, Wi-Fi, Google Wallet support and online chats (Really? No touting those newfangled UPC codes?), the fact that many of these IT efforts happened months ago made the compilation news release seem baffling. Baffling, that is, until we figured out the point: IT is now cool. Or at least Wall Street thinks it is.

To be specific, Wall Street doesn’t think that all IT investments are cool. It’s when IT investments come from companies where it’s not expected. When eBay or, heaven forbid, Amazon invest in IT, Wall Street lets them have it with both spreadsheets, in a way that they would have never criticized Wal-Mart for opening new stores. But when the Sears and Macy’s of the world start talking about these space-age computer thingies, stock analysts get all starry-eyed.

To be fair, the Macy’s statement did include a few legitimately new details in its list. For mobile and tablets: “This fall, about 350 stores will be using tablets to help customers research and select skin care products at Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s Clinique counters. In shoes, Bloomingdale’s will be using tablets and hand-held devices in five stores to help customers view and shop from the largest possible variety of styles and colors, including products at other Bloomingdale’s stores. In fine jewelry, 25 Macy’s stores are beginning to use tablets to demonstrate product features and offer coordinating jewelry pieces that may not be available in that particular location.”

On mobile payment, it revealed the specific number of Macy’s/Bloomingdale’s stores involved in the Google Wallet trial (219 stores in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.). And it also gave more details about its digital receipt efforts: “Beginning in late October, Macy’s will experiment with digital receipts in 50 selected stores across the country. When making a purchase, customers can choose to have a copy of their receipt E-mailed to them. In spring 2012, Macy’s customers will also have the option to select digital receipts only.”

But the point remains that this was an investor statement, and it illustrates a frightening truth. Even though it should be no news at all that the likes of Macy’s, Target, Sears and Walgreens are huge IT shops, Wall Street is still impressed with the efforts.

Much worse, though, are the chains’ assumptions about how well Wall Street understands IT efforts. The Macy’s statement was, pure and simple, a piece designed to cheerlead the chain’s technology efforts, which is an entirely worthy and appropriate endeavor. Consider, then, the carefully selected words attributed to CEO Terry Lundgren.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.