What’s The Matter, Wall Street? Amazon’s Soaring Profits Not Enough For You? The Attack On IT Investment

Written by Evan Schuman
January 31st, 2011

You know the best way to tell that you’ve just made a stunningly bad decision? When Wall Street cheers. Wall Street’s long history of applauding layoffs and detesting strategic long-term investments is well known. But its actions with Amazon a few days ago really raise serious doubts about whether any Wall Street trader should be allowed to have a driver’s license.

Amazon, as is its tendency, reported another record-breaking quarter. This time, it was a 36 percent revenue boost, to almost $13 billion in the quarter. Operating cash flow increased and—most critically—net income increased 8 percent, to $416 million for the quarter. For the full year, net income increased a stunning 28 percent (to $1.15 billion). It’s beating just about every competitor in its segment (for the record, what retailer is not in Amazon’s segment?).

So what’s the problem? What made Amazon’s shares plunge some 7.2 percent in New York trading? The company projected that the next quarter’s profit would fall 2 percent, to 34 percent. Wall Street is complaining about a 34 percent margin prediction?

What Amazon said is behind that 2 percent drop is what really infuriated Wall Street. Was it massive bonuses? (Not that they wouldn’t have been deserved.) Lavish all-hands meetings in Hawaii? Nope, it was investment in new fulfillment centers and IT infrastructure.

Consider these Wall Street analyst explanations, from stories filed by Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal. “Is this going to be a low-margin business?” said Colin Gillis, an analyst at BGC Partners in New York , who has a “sell” rating on the stock. “Amazon has hit a level of maturity. So the question is, how long do investors have to wait? ” Or this delicious comment: “It’s disappointing because we were expecting that investment spending will come down now, but it clearly hasn’t,” said Caris and Co. Analyst Sandeep Aggarwal.

It’s hard to stomach Wall Street celebrating record profits and overwhelming market share and yet criticizing the IT and related investments that enabled those profits and market share to happen. How do they think Amazon withstood a massive D-DOS attack from WikiLeaks fans, while everyone else who was attacked fell?

In E-Commerce (and the same clearly goes for Mobile and Social retail sites), the Amazon “stores” are IT investments. When Wal-Mart was swimming in profits, did Wall Street attack the company for opening more stores? With Amazon, its growth and expansion has to be done through ongoing infrastructure investments. When Aggarwal said that he was expecting that investment spending would come down by now, he can thank his investing stars it didn’t. Amazon’s profits for the rest of 2011 and 2012 will be the results of those investments.

I’m reminded of a conversation I had with a veteran Wall Street analyst several years ago, where we were discussing a move by Apple. Asked whether he thought that a particular rumor was true, he said “Absolutely not.” But he then added that he would recommend to his clients that they act as though it was true.

Why? The analyst answered: “I learned a long time ago that my job is not necessarily to be right. It’s to accurately guess what most of my oh-so-young colleagues will do. I think they’ll believe this, and I have to make my decisions based on that. Actual reality doesn’t have much of a role here any more.”

True enough. Here’s hoping that retail boards don’t take the wrong lesson from Amazon.


One Comment | Read What’s The Matter, Wall Street? Amazon’s Soaring Profits Not Enough For You? The Attack On IT Investment

  1. Lori Schafer Says:

    Evan, I’m shaking my head as I read this. I only can offer two words of commentary – Well said!


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.