advertisement
advertisement

Has Charming Shoppes Really Improved The Accuracy Of Buying Clothes Online?

Written by Evan Schuman
September 15th, 2011

One of the legendary challenges in selling apparel online has been getting clothes to fit. Sometimes, the fault is that customers can’t measure correctly—or perhaps they don’t want to measure correctly. Either way, if the clothes don’t fit, everyone loses. On Monday (Sept. 12), the 1,989 stores in the Charming Shoppes chains (in 48 states branded as Lane Bryant, Cacique, Fashion Bug, Catherines Plus Sizes and Figi’s) announced a survey tactic that replaces sizes and measurements with questions about body perceptions.

Company officials say they expect the system to be—please forgive us—measurably more accurate than any E-Commerce apparel tactic being used elsewhere today.

The process starts with a database of between 80 and 90 questions and asks between 20 and 22 questions of each shopper, with each answer dictating the next question. If all goes well, the entire process should be completed within three minutes and it’s often closer to 1.8 minutes, said Rob Holloway, the CEO of Zafu.com, the vendor working with Charming on the project.

The questions ask customers, for example, to describe their buttocks, which is a technique that would probably get many in-store associates an urgent meeting with HR. The idea is that customers—especially plus-sized consumers—might not tell the system accurate numbers, but the questions look for patterns. Often, people lie in the same general manner, giving the software a big hint about the customer’s true size.


(Related Story: Charming Shoppes E-Commerce Chief Speaks Of Retailer Social Ignorance)

Psychologically, this process really focuses on two very distinct areas: shapes and attitudes. Shapes gets into sizes and dimensions but approaches them with a much softer perception, a manner that is more accurate than poorly calculated inches. Attitude speaks to how emotionally attached the customer is to clothing in general.

One of the problems with apparel purchase accuracy is that many sites like to use the recommendation systems that work so well for everything else in E-Commerce, in which the system recommends something that was purchased by someone who seems to have similar taste. But with clothing sizing, that simply doesn’t work.

If the system works, customers will theoretically come back repeatedly. Given that the retailer retains all of the customer data—so that the customer need not answer the questions again—it can make for a very rich CRM profile. That raises an interesting question. When should the system prompt the customer to answer the questions again, on the theory that, over time, sizes can change?

“When answering questions alone on a computer, customers tend to be more honest than in-person,” said Bill Bass, who heads up E-Commerce operations for the Charming Shoppes chains.

Holloway said their system is 94 percent accurate. Although he admitted he had no figures for competing systems, he said “94 percent is so much more accurate than anything else that exists today.”

Bass said the 94 percent is the best balance that Charming Shoppes could achieve, in terms of an effort-to-benefit ratio. “Our goal is not to be perfect. How do we make this really easy for the customer and quick? Less than three minutes,” Bass said. “We had to come up with a balance. This is the best we can do in less than three minutes.”

Holloway agreed. “To get the accuracy up to 97 percent, we’d have to ask you a lot more questions,” he said. “We don’t want to ask someone to take an SAT exam to buy a pair of jeans.”

Come to think of it, I’ve spent many a weekend afternoon with my 14-year-old daughter and her friends buying jeans. Not so sure that requiring a high score on an SAT before a purchase is made would be such an awful idea.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.