advertisement
advertisement

Macy’s Hiding Black Friday In-Store GPS Test In Plain Sight

Written by Frank Hayes
November 14th, 2012

When word broke on November 8 that Macy’s is testing in-store navigation technology in its Herald Square flagship store, the chain was surprisingly silent. A week later, Macy’s is still saying nothing about the “indoor GPS” system, even though it has been in the chain’s iPhone app since late October. Meanwhile, Macy’s is promoting a Black Friday product-finding system the chain is doing with eBay.

Part of the reason for Macy’s silence on in-store navigation could be that it’s only in the flagship store. A more likely reason: There’s only one safe way to roll out untried technology on Black Friday, and that’s very, very quietly.

The in-store navigation system, which uses technology from Meridian Apps and is only installed at the Herald Square store, uses Wi-Fi triangulation to identify where the customer is on the phone’s screen with a big blue dot. If the customer searches for a specific department, brand or “point of interest” (we’re assuming that means restrooms), the app gives turn-by-turn directions for getting there.

None of that is really unusual—vendors have been pitching a wide range of ways to deliver indoor navigation for a while now. But it makes particularly good sense in a multi-floor traditional department store like the Macy’s flagship (and that’s leaving aside the fact that the store is progressively being remodeled). That floor plan is also the worst-case scenario for handling Wi-Fi-based navigation. Compared to that, a typical mall anchor store will likely be a piece of cake.

Wi-Fi-based location is also a relatively straightforward step up from current location implementations, which are typically shopping-list features that tell the customer where a particular product is by department or aisle number. Some of those, like the one Walgreens just rolled out, depend on planograms for each store. Others, like the one Walmart now offers for all its stores, just give product locations by aisle number. (Walmart is testing a version that pinpoints the product on a map, but only in one store in San Jose. In that test, the app tells the shopper exactly where within that aisle the product is supposed to be. That’s hardly item-level RFID precision, but it sure beats “it’s somewhere in Aisle 9B.”)

Once you know where the products are, the only thing missing to re-create a turn-by-turn GPS experience (besides a celebrity voice to give directions) is identifying the customer’s location. Macy’s is one of the first big chains to actually put it to work.

Why, then, is Macy’s clamming up about the new feature, which is specifically identified as part of the new version of the app on iTunes? That and a vendor press release scant on details are pretty much all we know about it.

True, it only works in one store, and it’s Thanksgiving parade time and Black Friday, and Macy’s has other chain-wide things it wants to promote. That includes the eBay-enabled Black Friday features, which include push notifications for unadvertised specials that are specific to local stores.

But Macy’s clearly wants iPhone-carrying customers to try the navigation feature. Why won’t it say more?


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.