The Verified Wal-Mart Giftcard That Wasn’t
Written by Evan SchumanEarlier this month, giftcard exchange site Plastic Jungle was approached by a giftcard seller, offering two $200 Wal-Mart giftcards. Site CEO Tina Henson declined to buy the cards directly and instead suggested the seller use the site’s auction area. The seller did and posted the cards for $125 and $135.
But when the site’s authentication team checked on the cards, the Wal-Mart computer reported that the cards were valid and their value was intact, but they had just been purchased the day before. Thinking it was odd that someone would pay $400 for cards and then the next day be willing to sell them for $260, the CEO was contacted, but she shrugged and approved the sale anyway. The cards quickly sold.
On Monday, the site member who purchased the cards called to report a problem. Two days after the buyer purchased the giftcards, Wal-Mart nullified them. That left Henson with a big mess to clean up and some mysteries to unravel.
The fraud has all the markings of a new scam making the rounds where a thief steals a credit card and quickly purchases giftcards and then just as quickly sells them. Even with law enforcement in cyber pursuit, the thief knows that he’ll have a few days before the giftcards are made invalid, which is a much longer life expectancy than the stolen credit card.
PlasticJungle’s Henson, who had literally boasted to a reporter earlier Monday afternoon that her site had never been hit by a fraudster, issued a new rule for the site: no card will be sold unless it’s at least 10 days old, making the site a much less attractive place to fence giftcards.
As giftcards soar in popularity, so too are the number of criminals looking to take advantage of them. The Web’s giftcard auction sites?including PlasticJungle.com, EBay.com, CardAvenue.com and SwapaGift.com?are going to have to change tactics repeatedly as fraudsters adapt to the latest defenses. The National Retail Federation recently issued guidelines on how consumers should protect themselves from giftcard fraud and it specifically cautioned consumers against using Web giftcard auction sites.
The problem with such auction sites is that it’s often a way for consumers to buy and sell from other consumers, with little oversight. Fraudsters who are afraid of getting caught by a bank or large E-Commerce site might think their chances are better selling to a lone consumer.
PlasticJungle’s Henson defends the integrity of her site and say that their site?which is currently free to use?doesn’t accept credit cards, debit cards, checks or any form of payment other than eBay’s PayPal. Her rationale? PayPal verifies the members more carefully than other systems?theoretically verifying that a legitimate E-mail address and snailmail address exists?and that eBay has a $1,000 insurance policy on transactions, she said.
Using the Wal-Mart $200 giftcards incident as an example, Henson said that the eBay rules wouldn’t permit PlasticJungle to represent their victimized customer?as they were officially not a party to the transaction. She said she contacted the victim and asked him to file a dispute with PayPal directly. “But I assured him that we would cover any of his losses that PayPal doesn’t pay,” Henson said.
Watching from the sidelines, retailers have to be ultra-careful. Any scams involving their cards is bad news for the retailer, not so much for the lost money (although that is a factor) as for the lost confidence in the integrity of their card even if the retailer did absolutely nothing wrong.
On the flipside, these discount auction sites?which often sell retailer giftcards for less than facevalue and, as such, as very attractive to consumers?represent a potentially substantial amount of revenue to the retailers and an even larger number of potential new customers to enter their doors (virtual or brick-and-mortar). PlasticJungle, for example, has said that it wants to work with retailers to have a direct presence in physical stores, reselling their cards at a discount.
Len Gilbert is VP of giftcards (as well as a VP of marketing) for Barnes & Noble and he is very careful when addressing this issue. “We don’t give advice about buying from auction sites,” he said, quickly adding “You’re best off buying directly from us to make sure that the giftcard you get is the giftcard you intended to get.”
One popular safety tool of auction sites is community policing, where a member that rips off another member is quickly given a very low reliability rating and is often then shunned. A Carnegie Mellon University project recently detailed efforts by fraudsters to work in groups to get around the community policing and how they have crafted a data analysis tool to identify such efforts.
December 18th, 2006 at 5:55 am
You say the retailer wasn’t at fault, but why didn’t they check the person’s ID who was purchasing the gift cards with a credit card. Thsi should be the proper procedure for every retail outlet.
December 18th, 2006 at 6:36 am
That was absolutely one of the questions we asked for that story. Most retail security people …. for the moment …. are against requiring ID to purchase with a credit card, as it slows the process too much. The rationale was twofold: First, that’s it’s almost unheard of to seek secondary identification when a customer is using a credit card in general. Secondly, giftcards in particular are sold on convenience. The more that slows it down, the less attractive they are. Not saying I agree, but that’s what was being said.
December 23rd, 2006 at 11:29 pm
Thank you for your article on gift cards and fraud. However, more than the scammers out there, the industry itself needs to be checked. Here’s what happened to us.
A friend gave us a gift card from > earlier this year. It had an expiration date that read “good thru 12/06”. Having our first baby, moving into a new house, dealing with major surgery put this on the back burner since we had months before we had to use this. When I called this evening to activate it, the $25 is now reduced to $7.50. Apparently after six months they levy a $2.50 service fee (because we all know a company can’t keep our money without taking more of it, right). Nowhere on the card is it mentioned that such a fee, or any fee, would be levied.And even if they did deduct $2.50 a month after the six month…how does that equal a balance of $7.50 in the twelfth month? Yet customer service (which is it definitely not!) wouldn’t budge. Apparently when our friend bought the card there was a link in fine print that explained this.
It amazes me! We are now required to give a disclaimer to recipients of our gifts. Because if we don’t, they will lose out on the gift…and the company that has already got paid for the service now gets to keep the money intended for other people.
In my travels overseas I’ve often told vendors that they should learn customer service from America. Apparently we’ve learned it from the rest of world and have lost it (in so many ways)!
Once again thanks for your article. We need to be aware of the fraud that is viral today, however we need to also be aware that there are companies that are willing to swindle customers through as many means as possible.
January 9th, 2007 at 9:51 pm
Nothing surprises me anymore involving retailing. The safe way is to go in a store and put whatever it is in your hands. Online is risky at best and fradulent at worst. The eBay thing doesn’t surprise me at all. I just spent two months slinging arrows with eBay, Paypal and a seller over a purchase that I never received 60 days after I bought it. Everybody tried to run and hide and claim it wasn’t their responsibility. After awhile, I just got nasty and finally got what I wanted. I still think they all suck, but life goes on.