A Digital Signage Network Paid For By Suppliers And Then Taken Home By Consumers

Written by Evan Schuman
October 5th, 2010

Few store managers question the power of well-placed digital signage, but the cost for acquiring and maintaining such systems can be daunting. What if retailers could get full access to a network of hundreds of customized pieces of digital signage, which they could place anywhere in their stores, displaying any message, all of it being paid for by a supplier?

The only price in this Faustian deal: You need to let your customers take the signs home with them, after they’ve paid you $40 or more for the privilege.

This strange scenario is prompted by a rollout of a new line of Dutch Vodka. (No jokes please about Dutch Vodka, beyond reminding readers about a wonderful moment in an early James Bond film —You Only Live Twice—where 007 kills an enemy agent and steals a drink from his refrigerator, before spitting it out after he looks at the label and disgustedly says, “Siamese Vodka!”)

The bottle sports a digital label, where consumers can program any message they want a gift recipient to see. But the company—Medea Vodka—that the next version will include remote and wireless programming, which would be fully controlled by the retailer, until that particular bottle is purchased.

Whether this particular product—or its company—will survive is somewhat beside the point. The concept of programmable bottles—and, for matter, other product packages—is fascinating. What if the store wanted to use these flashing messages on these bottles—strategically positioned in every aisle—to push strawberries or a sale on Tide detergent? The contents of the product displaying the message would be irrelevant.

Irrelevant, that is, unless you wanted it to be relevant. Example: “Congrats! Our local sports team just won, three minutes ago, 96 to 4, leaving the evil Losing Sports Team yelping and crying for Mommy. Drink me tonight to celebrate!” or the same message in the reverse, offering for the bottle to be drunk to drown the sorrows of having been clobbered by the competition.

It’s the idea of a network of these free—to the retailer—products displaying as many customized messages as you’d that has potential. And there’s no reason the signs all have to say the same thing. Why not program the cereal aisle bottles to say different things than the frozen food bottles?

There’s always the potential for allowing the bottles to detect RFID-enabled loyalty cards, to bring a little CRM magic to this picture. The manufacturer has even discussed adding motion sensors to the bottles.

But this is a future goal. Today’s version of the bottles—at least the ones from Medea—are a bit primitive. Their messages are limited to 140 characters, which is less than the length of two Twitter Tweets. (The bottle can handle 255 characters and Tweets are capped at 140 characters.)

They also must be individually programmed, which would make them much less interesting to retailers. They are supposed to be programmed by consumers, but I somehow don’t see that happening very often.

Why? Let’s look at the site’s instructions for consumers. How much time will a consumer give for instructions on creating a bottle message? Not sure, but it’s probably safe to say that a six-step process is way too much.

From their site: “Step 1: Press the ON/OFF button. Step 2: Press the ENTER button to enter programming mode. Step 3: Press the P-U (UP) to select line (1-6) to save message in. Step 4: Press ENTER to confirm the line where the message will appear. Step 5: Press the P-U and P-D buttons to find the first character of your message, and press ENTER to save after each character selection. Note: space can be found after the letter Z. Step 6: To finish, after you have selected the last character, wait until you see a blinking “A”, then press the ON/OFF to save the entire message. You’re all set! Your message will now begin to scroll on the ticker.” No problem.

It gets better. The site’s Q&A asks a good question: “I saved an incorrect character. Can I delete/edit or do I have to start my message over?” The answer: “Deleting and editing are not currently possible. You will have to start your message over.”

Yeah, that’s going to go over really well.

But if the line survives to get to phase two, where retailers can wirelessly control the messages from the LAN and where consumers can enter the messages from their computers, this may be the start of a whole new way of looking at digital signage. But much more testing is needed. I will selflessly pick up eight or nine Vodka bottles this weekend and start practicing. What I won’t do to help move retail to the next level.


One Comment | Read A Digital Signage Network Paid For By Suppliers And Then Taken Home By Consumers

  1. Joshua Persky Says:

    The cost for acquiring and maintaining digital signage systems does not have to be daunting. For a few hundred dollars per LED sign, retailers can deploy displays providing continuous fresh and relevant content, last minute deals and product news, engaging customers and driving sales.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.