advertisement
advertisement

Macy’s Killing Giftwrap Could Be A Great Move, If It’s Public Enough

Written by Evan Schuman
March 18th, 2010

When Macy’s confirmed this month that it is abandoning its classic giftwrap service at almost all of its stores (five out of the chain’s 850 stores will still offer the service), it became a wonderful metaphor for the industry’s lack of true service, one nicely represented by something that is—by definition—cosmetic and purely decorative.

In difficult economic times, functionality reigns; it can even trump price. But so many retailers miss golden opportunities to make their case effectively. Consider how many technologies have been portrayed as undermining customer service: self-checkout, kiosks, ATMs and even some elements of today’s mobile offerings.

The counter argument has been that these technologies allow retailers to redeploy people into positions where they can truly deliver customer service. The classic example: taking cashiers out of checkout lanes and instead having them carry customers’ bags to their cars.

Would Macy’s be facing less of a backlash if, instead of quietly laying off some of those box wrappers, it prominently featured them in highly visible customer-facing situations? Consider an associate working aisles wearing a button that declares: “I was taken off giftwrap so I can help you here.” Or maybe putting that associate back on the checkout lane, with this button phrasing: “Because I’m here and not in giftwrap, you’ll be done five minutes sooner.”

Some retailers have discovered that kiosks are much better received when they are seemingly being used to help/assist associates rather than replace them. (Perception, yet again, beats reality.) These stores will have an associate work with a customer at the kiosk, thereby leveraging the associate’s training (where he/she can presumably navigate the screen a lot faster than can the customer) and the kiosk’s deep reservoir of demos and inventory files.

In Macy’s giftwrap situation, the chain clearly seems to be making the right move. If customers are overwhelmingly not using giftwrap, it’s silly to maintain the service. Dan Butler, VP/Retail Operations at the National Retail Federation, said the causes are lengthy. Many chains are pushing very attractive giftbags (some of Nordstrom’s packaging is nicer than bows and ribbons), and the soaring numbers of giftcard purchases complicate matters. In many malls during the holidays, charities set up special rooms solely for giftwrapping and many consumers want to participate as a way of making a donation.

And Macy’s chose to not eliminate giftwrap globally, opting to preserve it for some of its largest and more upscale locations: Chicago (State Street); Orange County, CA (South Coast Plaza); Miami (Dadeland); San Francisco (Union Square); and, of course, its Miracle On 34th Street flagship, New York City’s Herald Square.

Some observers have disagreed with the Macy’s move, suggesting that as frills and similar services are cut back, Macy’s starts to lose its differentiators with discount chains. That criticism doesn’t seem to wash. If few consumers are using the service, it isn’t a very helpful differentiator. As long as Macy’s redeploys those people—as visibly as possible—to roles where they can perform services that customers truly appreciate, I can’t see the objection. Even Kris Kringle would be OK with that.


advertisement

3 Comments | Read Macy’s Killing Giftwrap Could Be A Great Move, If It’s Public Enough

  1. Michael R Hoffman Says:

    Another great customer contact opportunity forfeited. HR and finance are only looking at cost side of equation. The gift wrapping contact is the best value differentiator in many customer’s experience. It should be featured, not shut. What a great moment to capture referrals, grow brand value, represent vendor partners, cash in loyalty points (why not wrap for points). Wrap is an opportunity to cooperatively build an event with your customers on your own turf – the gift receipt, paper selection, gift note, card, warranty, upsell/cross-sell, extended store visit time – all quantifiable benefits – Read Customer Worthy (book) for the rest of the story

  2. Lee Says:

    Given the challenges of FINDING the gift wrap, I’m not surprised its not used – I’m a regular Macy’s shopper, and didn’t even know they did gift wrap … if the gift wrap table were in the middle of the women’s accessories, I’ll bet it would have gotten lots more business.

  3. concern Says:

    i personally feel macy’s is trying to save money, i have been in some of them stores that nolonger have gift wrapping. that employee no longer have a job, they do not put them on the floor to sale, they just get rid of the employee and cover it up. you use to get free gift wrapping depending on the macy’s credit card you have, know you have to travel either 5 or 10 miles, to one of there larger stores to get it, so is it worth traveling that far with the price of gas?. they have also stop the free shipping, alterations, and a lot of the other little perks they use to provide to you for opening an account with them or shopping so much there. i have given up on macy’s. they are a rip off for the customer and the employees there, just pull one to the side and talk to them, and you will find out for yourself.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.