advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Why New Best Buy E-Commerce Chief Is Focused On In-Store

October 10th, 2012

And then there’s BestBuy.com itself, which would be the traditional focus for a new E-Commerce exec. After listing some of his near-term goals (price competitiveness, promotions and offers, the site performing well and customers being able to find what they want), Durchslag offered a candid Best Buy assessment: “To be honest, compared with last year, being able to do those things well is an enormous improvement.”

That was apparently a reference to a huge mishap at Bestbuy.com on Black Friday 2011, when the site took and confirmed Black Friday orders in November and then waited until a few days before Christmas to cancel those orders. But it could have also been referencing a 17-hour site outage from Best Buy early this year, one that highlighted the chain’s merged-channel advances and, ironically, its interdependencies.

Durchslag touched on a different Best Buy perception challenge when he spoke of new and aggressive ways to use the chain’s Geek Squad. Given how many high profile incidents we’ve heard about—arrests of Best Buy customers who were turned over to police when Geek Squad associates found illegal files, cases where associates found social-media passwords and defaced customers’ accounts—we’d think privacy sensitivity should be uppermost. How would shoppers feel if their dry cleaners scanned all clothes for marijuana residue and turned in any customers with the illegal scent?

But Durchslag offered this example of where the Geek Squad could go, starting with an enhanced, in-store mobile-fueled experience: “I can immediately offer you a deal to extend the warranty for two years. You just bought this great Xbox. Do you want to be able to get Geek Squad coming by on a quarterly basis, (so the Geek Squad would) update all of your software? Do you want a subscription for those periodic visits? When Geek Squad comes to your house, if you’ve opted in to the personalized offers, they would be able to do an inventory of what other stuff you have in your house that would then be the basis for our ability to make other recommendations of highly relevant things to you. That’s kind of the experience I am talking about.”

It’s true that the Geek Squad operation lets Best Buy get closer to customers than almost any other chain: not just virtually into their phones and computers, but physically into their homes. There’s a two-decade track record, and that softens a little bit of the creepiness of inviting in retail-chain associates. But trusting these techs to launch an invasive inventory of everything Best Buy might want a piece of in the future? Remember, Best Buy sells refrigerators, washers, car stereos and DVDs for kids. That creepiness gap can close pretty quickly.

The E-Commerce chief also spoke of how gradual such changes would have to happen, and he spoke in more programming than marketing terms: “It’s the difference between a waterfall approach to technology development versus an agile approach. You want to be able to get to a model that lets you be able to make lots of small changes quickly—test, iterate and learn. And be able to continuously improve. I think we’ll be able to make a series of small changes quite quickly and then those start to build on each other. It isn’t like you just turn on the site one day in six months and, all of a sudden, everything looks and feels radically different. You wouldn’t want to do that anyhow, because you would lose a lot of consumers in the process. You want this to be a journey of continuous improvement.”

That doesn’t sound like a retailer at all; it sounds like a pure IT guy, which may end up being Durchslag’s biggest advantage (he doesn’t know what’s impossible, so he’ll do it anyway) or his Achilles heel. Retail brands aren’t software systems. They don’t behave rationally. And retail customers behave even less rationally than conventional application users. Changing how those customers view Best Buy is a problem on top of fixing Best Buy’s actual pricing, associate training and customer experience problems—a lesson the pure retailers who are revamping JCPenney are still working through.

Fixing those technology issues first might be a really good idea. They may be the easiest problems on Durchslag’s list.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.