Best Buy Outage And The Downside To Merged Channels

Written by Evan Schuman
March 28th, 2012

When Best Buy wrapped up a planned 17-hour site outage on Wednesday (March 28), it came away with more than an updated E-Commerce system. The retailer learned the downside of tight merged channel integration and what happens when in-store becomes too dependent on online operations.

Years of improved online-offline integration has been great news for chains, but the level of day-to-day integration is now only keenly felt when that site disappears for the bulk of a day. Associates who are used to looking up information on the site, placing online orders for customers when inventory doesn’t exist and using the site as a virtual catalogue suddenly found themselves having to rely on in-store systems.

What Best Buy did, though, is becoming more common. Just last month, it was Home Depot’s turn. (Home Depot was down for 18 hours.) Best Buy’s pre-announced journey into HTML darkness started at 10 PM (New York time) on Tuesday and ended right on schedule at 3 PM (New York time) on Wednesday.

As Best Buy’s own FAQ pointed out, has integrated itself throughout in-store, call center and, generally, all operations. “While the updates are occurring, customers will be unable to search or browse products, place orders or check order status on, (mobile or tablet), and store kiosks,” the FAQ said. Customers also “will not receive E-mails regarding orders while the updates are in progress” and checking order status—plus, of course, making online purchases—”will also be inaccessible to store employees, call center agents and online support representatives.”

Although mobile sites were also down—more on that in a moment—Best Buy was able to keep about 14 of its sites operational. These sites seem to have no transactional functions and included, Best Buy Careers, Best Buy Investor Relations,, Best Buy Community Relations and Best Buy Credit Card Account Management.

Stephen Baker, an analyst with the NPD Group, said few retailers have given much thought to the downsides of embracing merged channel. “As you more closely integrate Web systems and the store systems, the inevitable Web blowout is going to have more implications,” Baker said.

One interesting part of the integration is mobile. There are two general ways to handle mobile sites and the easiest way is to have the mobile constantly grab and convert content from the Web site, with the mobile site being essentially a mirror of the core site. The second approach is to manage them as separate operations. The mirror approach is cheaper—no ongoing team needs to constantly populate the mobile content—and it makes it less likely that some product change will fall through the cracks.

The parallel approach, though, has the advantage of enabling customers to be able to do product research, find stores and at least access historical data. And, done properly, orders might be possible, ideally on a batch-and-forward approach. In the same way that in-store purchases during a power outage can be updated once operations are restored, a mobile site could operate as an emergency backup. This would be helpful during a planned outage—such as the one Best Buy experienced this week—but it could be a lifesaver during unplanned outages.

Admittedly, part of this approach would play to shopper psychology. A message such as the one Best Buy and Home Depot published, which essentially said, “We’ll be down for almost a day and that’s just the way it is. You can drive to a store or wait for us. Or maybe try Amazon,” can be viewed as harsh.

But consider how much softer that message would have been had it said, “You can, of course, still place any orders with us and check on status via your mobile device.” Even if few shoppers take you up on the offer, it will sound less like you’re abandoning them.

Like the Home Depot situation, some are going to question whether a major site such as these really needs to be taken down for a planned upgrade. The counter, though, is that taking the site fully down might be a less risky approach than worrying about losing orders when the site is up and key upgrades are happening. The cloud can help—and Best Buy is aggressively experimenting with cloud efforts—but, ultimately, biting the bullet and shutting down for less than a day may be the safest near-term approach. Now if only the mobile sites could help out.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.