advertisement
advertisement

Amazon’s New Subscribe & Save Grocery Service A Good Idea But With The Wrong Merchandise

Written by Evan Schuman
May 16th, 2007

Amazon is truly trying to make a go of the online grocery segment, and the Subscribe & Save feature it introduced on Tuesday is a good example of how. But the new program?which promises customers automatic delivery of grocery products with discounts of 15 percent and free shipping?is also an illustration of Amazon?s initial weakness.

Several E-Commerce sites have tried to make a profit with grocery online, with Priceline probably the most notorious at making a big noise and a big loss. One of the few that seems to be making some serious headway is Peapod, which has the pedigree to do grocery right: It?s owned by Stop & Shop.

The Subscribe & Save concept is based on the idea that most consumers have to repeatedly purchase the same product at regular intervals. So why not automate it and save the customers the trip?

Maria Renz, runs the grocery efforts for Amazon as their VP of Consumables. In a statement Amazon issued on Tuesday, Renz gave the pitch for the new service.

?We are excited to enable customers to set up automatic reorders of their favorite products delivered to their door at discounted prices,? Renz said. ?And with free shipping, the cost and convenience of Subscribe & Save is a winning combination.?

The program apparently sends automatic e-mail reminders allowing customers to make changes as needed or ?cancel at any time. The program requires no minimum purchase amount and no time commitment for ultimate flexibility,? she said.

Amazon said the launch includes more than ?22,000 non-perishable items from leading brands, including Kellogg?s, Seventh Generation and Huggies.?

But a quick peek at their available products puts this into context. For example, one item where I thought this might be an especially valuable service is for bottled water because it?s needed regularly, can be heavy to hold and?with certain limits that can be assumed with the typical warehouse and truck?is temperature and shelf-life agnostic.

So go onto Amazon and click on their grocery list for ?water.? On the day of the announcement, it offered a total of three options: Zico Pure Coconut Water; Kellogg?s Special K20 Protein Water Lemon Twist; and the same Kellogg?s brand for ?tropical blend.? Those are probably fine water choices (the coconut one is a big maybe) but what about the more traditional established water brands? Compare that to the same search conducted at Peapod.com, which returns water from Poland Spring, Aquafina, Evian, Fiji and others. That was just under drinking water, but Peapod also offered ?enhanced? waters. (Personally, if I want water that has a hint of orange taste, I just buy a cheap orange juice.)

A search for ?soda??another American grocery store favorite?illustrates the same trend. The Amazon soda list consisted of products from Essn and Airforce?and that was it. Hardly the dominant providers in the soft drink arena.

Amazon?s efforts are worth applauding for their strategy and pricing, but the initial products they offer are underwhelming. It?s as though Amazon tried starting its bookstore existence by offering obscure books by arguing to consumers that they?re really written well. The product quality may be fine, but if they don?t offer the most expected brands in most categories, it?s going to be hard to change American consumer habits. Especially when much better-stocked options such as Peapod.com exist.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.