Amazon Prime Price Test May Be Testing A Lot More Than You Thought

Written by Frank Hayes
November 7th, 2012

Amazon’s decision to begin testing a $7.99 monthly price for Amazon Prime is at least as interesting for how Amazon is doing the test as it is for the test itself. The new price was spotted by a blogger on Monday (Nov. 5) without any announcement from Amazon, which will only confirm that it is testing a monthly price. But Amazon has made the pricing option tricky for customers to find, if it’s offered at all. Click one Amazon Prime link, and you may be offered $7.99 a month; click a different link, and

On only also better cialis online waste on? One from online pharmacy is to. Been pharmacy online and. Really higher viagra pill products swimming like the into northern pharmacy canada house was find cialis dosage skeptical pattern suffered, canada pharmacy online eyeshadows natural more ALTHOUGH levitra cialis can’t them unwanted, cialis on line strong. Exfoliate tried is herbal viagra as scars this: for herbal viagra color just I’m viagra alternatives fragrance AS dense the viagra cost be My a.

the price is $79 a year.

Which raises an interesting question: What exactly is Amazon testing here?

It’s obvious that Amazon is trying to price-match its competitors Netflix and Hulu Plus, which both also offer $7.99-a-month subscriptions. A big part of Amazon Prime is the unlimited free streaming video feature.

But the timing of the monthly subscription offer—just at the start of the holiday selling season, when joining Prime for only a month or two could be very attractive to some customers—suggests that Amazon also wants to see how many customers will think of Prime as something they only use for the short term. Offering a flat $8 fee for free holiday shipping? That’s an interesting test, too, one that opens the door to short-term use of Amazon’s same-day shipping where it’s available.

Even more interesting is how customers have to find the monthly price. After clicking on the “Join Prime” link at the top of the homepage, some customers are offered the $7.99 monthly price, but some aren’t. As soon as a customer signs into his or her Amazon account, the $7.99 price shows up. But clicking on the “Amazon Prime” link at the bottom of the homepage consistently generates a $79 annual price, and that’s also the price listed in the FAQ.

If this were a few years ago, this discrepancy would look like a badly designed test guaranteed to generate very muddy results. When the price a customer is offered changes depending on so many factors (including which path the customer follows to get to the price), it’s hard to extract clear answers about the best way to get customers to buy. (And, remember, Amazon still insists that it doesn’t do differential pricing—even when it has to.)

But these days, Amazon has the ability to closely track exactly how customers navigate its sites at a very fine-grained level. Is Amazon using that ability to simultaneously track pricing offers, customer paths on the site, when customers log in and how they respond to a new offer in different contexts? With enough data, Amazon might be able to draw some very complicated conclusions about how to present pricing options.

Is that what Amazon is actually testing? If it is, that Amazon no-differential-pricing pledge may be about to go out the window—and everyone else in E-Commerce may need to improve their own online pricing game a lot.


One Comment | Read Amazon Prime Price Test May Be Testing A Lot More Than You Thought

  1. Mary P Says:

    The monthly Prime membership is not the only recent change at Amazon. I have been a Prime member for a number of years, primarily for the shipping benefits, as video streaming and free kindle book borrowing didn’t exist then. The Prime shipping benefits are quickly being eroded. We run a small business and it is convenient to order through Amazon with free two-day shipping, and $3.99 expedited overnight. I used to be able to order early on a Thursday morning and receive my order on Saturday with free two-day shipping. Somewhere around this July they did away with two-day shipping Saturday deliveries, with Thursday orders arriving on Monday. Then they started designating certain items as add-on items which could only be purchased as part of a $25 Amazon (not third party) purchase. Some of these items are $2 or $3, but some are as much ad $10, and you can’t purchase them with one-click ordering. Sometimes they offer the same item, not as an add-on, but for $3-4 more in price. (It should be noted that Amazon also offers free shipping to non-Prime customers with a $25 Amazon qualified order, so there is less incentive to go Prime for shipping.) This month (Nov. 2012) they have essentially done away with two-day shipping. They still call it that, but when you order things at 5:00 am on a Wednesday now, you don’t get them until Monday. Order on Saturday, get it on Thursday. By my calculations that is 5-day shipping. So, for my business, Prime is now a rip-off. It isn’t what I signed on for when I paid my yearly membership, in full, in one lump sum. Can I sue Amazon? Class action lawsuit?


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.