Amazon’s In-Store One-Day Mobile Experiment Worrying Retailers Needlessly

Written by Evan Schuman
December 7th, 2011

A 26-hour (minus one minute) Amazon in-store mobile price-comparison experiment starting Friday (Dec. 9) is scaring a lot of retailers, who fear that allowing consumers to scan barcodes, compare prices and buy from within the store will hurt them. One retail lobbying group objects to Amazon taking advantage of its sales-tax-free status to make in-store sales.

Much of the concern may have little foundation, because Amazon has low-balled the incentives to such an extent that it’s unclear if many consumers will even bother to try it.

The deal is that consumers who download the free Price Check By Amazon mobile application (if a consumer tries to search for Amazon as the first word, it won’t work) can use it to scan prices in-store. Nothing new there. But from 9:00 PM (California time) December 9 through 11:59 PM (California time) December 10, if a consumer runs a check and chooses to place the item in the Amazon shopping cart and completes the purchase within 24 hours, that customer gets an Amazon credit. The purchase is limited to items in Electronics, Toys, Sports, Music and DVDs.

The price incentive? It’s five percent, with a ceiling of $5 per item and a max of three items. In other words, if a consumer buys $300 worth of merchandise at Amazon, he or she will receive a whopping $15 off. Then again, the shipping charges for three $100 items is likely to well exceed $15, depending on the shipping deal accepted. On the flip side, that 5 percent is less than the sales tax in most U.S. states.

More likely purchases are not, though, in the $100 range. A more typical scanned price of $20, for example, delivers an entire dollar to consumers, assuming they qualify. Given that it is only one day (plus two hours), couldn’t Amazon have tried an incentive that would have truly motivated consumers to try a new behavior?

Retailers also have psychology on their side. The consumer wants this product and the product is in his or her hands. The consumer could have it in a few minutes, or he or she could wait the bulk of a week. Saving one buck on a $20 item hardly seems sufficient motivation for that type of a wait.

If this experiment works, however, Amazon has many potential benefits. From the CRM perspective, the online giant already has excruciatingly comprehensive files on what every one of its customers has bought, in addition to everything they’ve thought of buying. If this mobile app works well, Amazon will also be able to add many products customers considered buying while shopping at competitors. How much would that be worth to you?

Getting back to the incentives for consumers to cooperate, the lack of tax charges is the key point for the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA). RILA’s Jason Brewer argues that the Amazon experiment is wrong, not because of the competition for the sale but because the lack of a sales tax for an in-store sale is simply galling.

“Our issue isn’t haggling over whether this app allows consumers to compare prices. Retailing is a highly competitive industry, and consumers have always had the ability to compare prices and retailers the ability to match or beat a price. That the Sunday circular is being replaced on some level by the iPhone is not a problem,” Brewer said. “The fact that Amazon can exploit a loophole in federal law and then use the App (in competitors’ stores) to offer a price without sales tax added highlights the need for Congress to close this loophole. It’s not the $5 sale that bothers us; that’s capitalism. It’s the sales tax loophole that distorts a free market and provides a perceived 6 to 10 percent advantage that no brick-and-mortar retailer can match.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.