Amazon’s Most Romantic List Suffers From Assumption Errors

Written by Evan Schuman
February 8th, 2011, that lover of lists, issued its list of the Top 20 Most Romantic Cities in America on Tuesday (Feb. 8). But if the world’s E-Commerce leader wants to stay on top of the A-List List-Makers List, it should put more thought into these things.

Its criteria? “Compiling sales data of romance novels and relationship books (Kindle books and print books), romantic comedy movies (digital movies and DVDs), Barry White albums (CDs and MP3s), along with sexual wellness products, since Jan. 1, 2011, on a per capita basis in cities with over 100,000 residents.” (What? No sales of dozens of roses or chocolate?)

Wouldn’t the most romantic cities purchase the fewest of those items, because they have the real thing and don’t need to read about it or have Barry White get them in the mood? Wouldn’t the ocean waves or the shining stars or the perfumed breeze from the Cacao fields do the trick? (As for sexual wellness products, a truly romantic city would buy ’em in bulk from Sam’s Club or Costco.)

And some of these details really don’t need a heck of a lot of analysis. The least romantic cities, according to Amazon, were: El Monte, Calif.; Paterson, N.J.; and Miami Gardens, Fla. Gosh, Paterson is no longer the romantic draw? I am stunned, readers, truly stunned. For the record, the most romantic cities were listed as Alexandria, Va.; Knoxville, Tenn.; Orlando, Fla.; Miami, Fla.; Ann Arbor, Mich.; Columbia, S.C.; Cincinnati, Ohio; Murfreesboro, Tenn.; Gainesville, Fla.; Tallahassee, Fla.; Vancouver, Wash.; Round Rock, Texas; Pittsburgh, Pa.; Salt Lake City, Utah; Arlington, Va.; Las Vegas, Nev.; Clarksville, Tenn.; St. Louis, Mo.; Dayton, Ohio; and Frisco, Texas.

Oh, and here’s a mixed blessing for realtors: “For the second year in a row, Miami [Fla.] is the Sexiest City in America, winning the top spot in the sexual wellness category.” Or, given the delays associated with Amazon shipping, perhaps the least spontaneous.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.