An RFID Makeup Test That Goes Well Beyond Cosmetics

Written by Evan Schuman
January 29th, 2007

An innovative RFID trial in Tokyo is using RFID-tagged lipstick to record when various samples are tried as well as to give store clerks full customer history of products purchased as well as tried.

The trial?involving retail chain Mitsukoshi, cosmetics company Shiseido and RFID vendor Fujitsu?also offers consumers a “virtual real-time makeup” session featuring a camera-equipped kiosk, display and RFID tag reader “that will enable customers to view on the display how particular products would look on their face by waving tagged cosmetic products such as lipsticks or eyeshadows over the tag reader,” the companies said in a statement.

Anticipating a time when customers will want to do these visual adjustments at home, the trial is also giving 50 consumers tagged makeup, PCs and tag readers so they can play with the makeup at home, while their every choice is recorded with their customer profile.

The trial will also leverage the trends of “social retailing” and “collaborative selling,” which are fancy terms for leveraging the opinions of strangers to influence purchases. Touch-screen displays will allow customers “to view word-of-mouth information about the products from other customers by waving tagged testers over the tag readers.

The trials started Jan. 26 and are scheduled to run through Feb. 12, all sponsored by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI).

Giving some hint into the number of people involved in the project, this trial is actually a part of a METI-sponsored project that is technically commissioned to the Japan Department Store Association that has been given the catchy name “The 2007 Field Trial for Improving Distribution and Logistics Efficiency through the Use of Electronic Tags.” If this was an American project, we’d already be calling it FTIDLEUET (to be pronounced Fatid-Loo-it by the geekier among us).

Although the at-home and virtual makeup mirrors are cutting edge, the bulk of the trial is simply using the tagged products to display makeup details on a touch-screen terminal.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.