advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Best Buy Express Kiosk Acting Very Differently Than It Was Supposed To

April 26th, 2012

That was news to David Popler, the Senior VP/Sales at Zoom (who handles media inquiries), who said he thought the kiosks always had the same return policies as the stores. Apparently, no one told that to the kiosk at this airport Hilton in Chicago.

“But Best Buy Express machines have a pretty hard-nosed return policy: you can return a gadget only if it’s unopened or defective, and then only by calling a toll-free number and waiting for a prepaid shipping label,” McCracken wrote. “Buyer’s remorse isn’t an adequate excuse. And as my receipt put it, ‘Items purchased through Best Buy Express™ MAY NOT be returned to Best Buy stores or through BestBuy.com.'”

When we asked Popler about the experience at that kiosk, he was very helpful, but had been instructed by his customer (Best Buy) to have me talk with them. He didn’t know, though, who at Best Buy I was supposed to speak with. After reaching out to several Best Buy people, I heard from Best Buy spokesperson Jeremy Baier.

Baier promised a statement detailing what had happened with the kiosk. The statement sent, though, didn’t go into specifics. “We’re taking the time to reexamine our processes around the Express kiosks, but have nothing further at this time to share with you,” he wrote.

We seem to have three issues here. First, Best Buy has to decide if these kiosks are to be treated as another Best Buy channel, alongside mobile, E-Commerce and in-store. If so, then the chain needs to maintain identical policies. Yes, that means items can be returned to a Best Buy store and the return rules can’t be any different than if an item had been purchased at a physical store.

By the way, a standalone machine in the middle of a hotel needs to have more generous return rules. These aren’t candy bars. When the products are expensive electronics, there’s a lot of customer fear to overcome.

Second, somebody—Zoom, Best Buy or some third party—needs to check that the machines are indeed playing by the agreed-upon rules. And third, typos are a fact of life. If the programming assumed no one would make a typo and have to correct it (E-mail systems are really picky), someone skimped too much on real-world testing.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.