Bloomingdale’s Mirror Effort Gets Shoppers Out Of The Dressing Room And Into The Database

Written by Evan Schuman
January 9th, 2013

When Bloomingdale’s trialed the latest version of the virtual mirror at 20 of its stores this past Fall, the chain’s pitch to consumers was one of convenience and modesty. Shoppers could try on lots of clothes and accessories without having to take off their clothes. But the real benefit was in another type of exposure: Getting shoppers to try on, accept and sometimes reject, outfit after outfit, and do it all while being recorded and having every choice captured and catalogued for marketing.

The data went to Bloomingdale’s in aggregate, but the system could just as easily deliver CRM-friendly customer-specific data. The mirrors enable shoppers to try on far more outfits and combinations than time—or store inventory—would ever permit.

The system Bloomingdale’s used is called Swivel, from FaceCake Marketing. Mirror approaches have been tried many times, but they haven’t found any great success. Bloomingdale’s was actually one of the first retailers to try a mirror tactic, way back in 2007. John Lewis in the U.K. tried it last year, with lackluster results.

This Swivel approach seems more likely to gain traction, although it still needs work. The online demo shows the clothes not exactly staying where they are supposed to, pushed aside (albeit briefly) every time the shopper moves an inch or so. So, yes, it’s hardly modern motion picture-quality CGI. But for an experimental retail technology, it seems to do what it needs to do.

The point is not precise video as much as, “Does it give shoppers persuasive reasons to use it?” It seems to. The system not only enables the most clothing samples to be tried in the least amount of time, but it enables several items to be tried simultaneously—such as a shirt with a recommended scarf and necklace. No clasping needed for the necklace and no tying needed for the scarf.

As for getting customers’ to share their identity, it’s not difficult, said Donna Amato, FaceCake’s marketing director. “You just have a promotion. ‘You put in your name, try five gowns and get $15 off,'” she said.

The screen not only displays a constantly changing assortment of recommended add-ons—they change as the shopper indicates more likes and dislikes through her choices—but also enables direct purchases from the same screen.

In terms of the cost for the system, Amato said they vary wildly, depending on many customization options. “Bloomingdale’s provided us a very nice piece of furniture that they built to house the flat-screen TV,” she said, adding that it was designed to fit into the Bloomingdale’s look-and-feel.

As a practical matter, the best use of such a virtual demo is to enable a shopper to narrow down a list of what she truly wants to buy. But she would still use the old-fashioned changing rooms to try the suggestions the screen made her want.

That speaks to the current limitations of this approach. Until the system can accurately replicate the feel of the material and the exact way a garment hangs on the customer, those drawbacks will still be there. Then again, can the typical dressing room mirror easily show how an outfit looks from the back, without neck pain? Looking into a mirror to see the reflection of another mirror? Not nearly as cool as even bad CGI.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.