Burger King, Victoria’s Secret, Unilever, ShopRite Go Mobile Coupon

Written by Evan Schuman
June 4th, 2009

Four more major players threw their keypads into the mobile payment ring this week, but Burger King, Victoria’s Secret, Unilever and ShopRite are all mobilizing in very different ways.

Burger King’s approach is through a dedicated app for the iPhone, allowing for customers to locate Burger Kings and make pre-orders through their phone, as well as receive discounts based on purchase histories.

Victoria’s Secret’s new mobile experiment is more of an adjunct to its catalogue (paper and online), with the mobile app needing a catalogue number before an item can be purchased and tracked. Once a consumer accesses the little list of Limited’s lecherous lithe lingerie, discounts are also offered. Unlike Burger King’s discounts that are tied to a consumer’s purchase history, the initial Victoria’s Secret offerings are generic, such as giving any shopper spending more than $100 on the mobile site free shipping.

And in Hillsborough, N.J., consumer goods giant Uniliver—owner of Knorr, Lipton, Wishbone, Hellman’s, Breyers, SlimFast, Dove, Vaseline, Lux and Knorr, among others—is running a trial at a ShopRite store that involves cashiers scanning the consumer’s cellphone screen, which will display a digital coupon. Unlike Burger King and Victoria’s Secret, the Unilever mobile trial only works in-store, but the coupons must first be downloaded from the Web site of Samplesaint, a Chicago vendor that is handling the Unilever New Jersey trial.

A detailed story in The Wall Street Journal about the Unilever trial put some of the challenges of the scan-the-cellphone-instore approach into context.

“The potential for entry errors and other glitches has kept some big companies from trying the format, said Landy Ung, founder of 8coupons, which provides online coupons for the New York market. Steven Boal, CEO of printable-coupon site, says checkout with a mobile coupon is ‘fraught with peril,’ ranging from incompatible devices to software bugs to phones that get dropped while being passed back and forth. In addition, many retail scanners can’t penetrate a cellphone screen to read the coupon,” the Journal story said. “Lawrence Griffith, CEO of Samplesaint, said his company’s technology has solved most of those problems, and is expected to greatly reduce coupon fraud, since coupons will vanish from the cellphone after redemption and can’t be forwarded or E-mailed. ‘We have full control.'”

Dairy Queen this week is also getting into mobile coupons, but it’s trial is avoiding the use of cellphones entirely, working solely with the RFID tag.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.