Buy Online-Pick-Up-In-Store, Grocery Style. Hannaford’s Efficiency Experiment

Written by Evan Schuman
August 3rd, 2011

The 178-store Hannaford grocery chain is trialing a grocery tweak on buy-online-pick-up-in-store, where shoppers select almost anything from the test store’s 40,000 SKUs and then drive to the store, where the order is loaded into the customer’s trunk. The effort, which involves three isolated temperature-controlled holding areas, pits employee efficiency against thin grocery profit margins.

The Hannaford-to-go program is also likely to cost the chain some impulse purchases, but that’s the downside of any E-Commerce effort. The question is whether this program will lure in more customers and/or build more loyalty from existing shoppers.

The trial, which was launched in mid-March at one New Hampshire store and is slated to expand to a second store “in the fall,” has “gotten off to a better start than we expected. We found that [customers] shopped the whole store. That surprised us a bit,” said Mike Norton, a spokesman for the five-state regional chain, with stores in Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts and New York.

Although the trial being expanded to a second store would presumably signal the initial test results have been favorable, Norton stressed a multi-month one-store trial may not prove that much. Whether the concept is working “is not clearly proven and it’s not clearly disproven.”

The marketing value of the program aside, the question remains as to whether store employees can profitably locate and assemble groceries—including splitting frozen and refrigerated items into two holding areas, with a third area for temperature-neutral products and then later reassembling the full order at pickup.

For orders worth less than $126, the store charges a $5 service fee, but that won’t go very far in covering labor costs. Then again, if the store can shrewdly use every moment of employee downtime during less-busy parts of the day, it could leverage otherwise-wasted employee time. “The potential is to be very efficient with the labor,” Norton said. “You’ve got to be very efficient in how to pick that order. We know a little bit about that. It’s a matter of how quickly we can assemble it.”

Two parts of this program are potentially very powerful. First, can this approach address the part of grocery shopping that is often most despised, namely searching for those few hard-to-find items. Second, will this program indeed translate into retail loyalty for traditional in-store shopping? In other words, will this only work on a small scale or can it profitably work if this approach really takes off in a community? Either way, it’s nice to see some aggressive experimentation in grocery.


2 Comments | Read Buy Online-Pick-Up-In-Store, Grocery Style. Hannaford’s Efficiency Experiment

  1. MilesT Says:

    Tesco has also been experimenting with this in the UK, leveraging their existing home delivery picking website and infrastructure. A couple of stores on trial at the moment

  2. ed Says:

    This is the model we are pursuing for inner-city retailing and it has no choice but to work. This purchase-online/pickup in store model accomodates just-in-time inventory and better internal control for many high-density areas that are considered “food deserts” and have no access to retailers nearby.

    In terms of impacting impulse buys, I believe it will greatly enhanced impulse buys as retailers will have more time to programmatically scan the pre-ordered virtual basket and generate recommended items by the time the customer picks up. Even further we can text deals to their mobile phone while they are in route.

    I believe this model will work best in urban environments as I described for small-format groceries, micro-retailing and pop-up store operations.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.