Circuit City Parts Ways With Its CIO

Written by Evan Schuman
October 16th, 2006

One of retail’s most important IT executives–Circuit City CIO Mike Jones–has left the $11.6 billion chain, with the chief IT job going to his VP of business applications.

Jones had a very creative and visionary perspective for the chain and a company statement left unclear the circumstances of his departure, although the vaguely ominous phrase “to pursue other interests” was used. The statement said Jones will relinquish his CIO role “immediately” but added that “he will remain at the company until mid-November to transition his duties to his replacement.”

That replacement is William E. McCorey, Jr. The 48-year-old McCorey has worked in Circuit City’s IT department almost continously since 1991, departmenting briefly to serve as the CIO for 2nd Swing, according to a Circuit City statement. The 2nd Swing Web site says the chain is “going out of business” and “all stores closing soon.” A 2nd Swing employee–who asked to not have his name used–said the bankruptcy decision only happened a month or two ago.

As VP of business applications, he was responsible for “implementing large scale retail applications, including the company’s new point of sale system and the merchandising systems transformation,” a Circuit City statement said.

Circuit City today operates about 632 Superstores and five other locations in 158 U.S. media markets, plus 949 retail stores and dealer outlets in Canada.

The CircuitCity statement quoted CEO Philip J. Schoonover thanking Jones “for his leadership and many contributions. He was an instrumental part of the turnaround efforts at Circuit City over the last three years” and added that CEO “wish[es] him all the best in his future endeavors.”

The same statement included comments attributed to Jones: “”I am proud to be part of Circuit City’s strong leadership team. I feel confident that our work to transform our company and systems is on track, making this a natural time for me to explore other business opportunities. I am also delighted to have such a capable and ready replacement in Bill McCorey. One of my rewards has been witnessing Bill’s growth and leadership over the years.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.